Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20146803›Full record

Trial reportTrials2010

Evidence-based interventions in dementia: A pragmatic cluster-randomised trial of an educational intervention to promote earlier recognition and response to dementia in primary care (EVIDEM-ED).

Steve Iliffe, Jane Wilcock, Mark Griffin, Priya Jain, Ingela Thuné-Boyle, Tamar Koch, Frances Lefford

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00866099 (Evidence-based Interventions In Dementia EVIDEM-ED), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00866099 phase2 / phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Evidence-based Interventions In Dementia EVIDEM-ED: Early Recognition and Response in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2009 to 2012Enrolled125ConditionsDementiaArmsEducational Dementia training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Under-provision of medical care for vascular diseases for people with dementia in primary care: a cross-sectional review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
    Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Steve IliffeResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, UK. s.iliffe@ucl.ac.uk
Jane Wilcock
Mark Griffin
Priya Jain
Ingela Thuné-Boyle
Tamar Koch
Frances Lefford
University College London · GBRoland Hill (United Kingdom) · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0606-1005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe National Dementia Strategy seeks to enhance general practitioners' diagnostic and management skills in dementia. Early diagnosis in dementia within primary care is important as this allows those with dementia and their family care networks to engage with support services and plan for the future. There is, however, evidence that dementia remains under-detected and sub-optimally managed in general practice. An earlier unblinded, cluster randomised controlled study tested the effectiveness of educational interventions in improving detection rates and management of dementia in primary care. In this original trial, a computer decision support system and practice-based educational workshops were effective in improving rates of detecting dementia although not in changing clinical management. The challenge therefore is to find methods of changing clinical management. Our aim in this new trial is to test a customised educational intervention developed for general practice, promoting both earlier diagnosis and concordance with management guidelines. DESIGN/

methodThe customised educational intervention combines practice-based workshops and electronic support material. Its effectiveness will be tested in an unblinded cluster randomised controlled trial with a pre-post intervention design, with two arms; normal care versus the educational intervention. Twenty primary care practices have been recruited with the aim of gaining 200 patient participants. We will examine whether the intervention is effective, pragmatic and feasible within the primary care setting. Our primary outcome measure is an increase in the proportion of patients with dementia who receive at least two dementia-specific management reviews per year. We will also examine important secondary outcomes such as practice concordance with management guidelines and benefits to patients and carers in terms of quality of life and carer strain. DISCUSSION: The EVIDEM-ED trial builds on the earlier study but the intervention is different in that it is specifically customised to the educational needs of each practice. If this trial is successful it could have implications for the implementation of the National Dementia Strategy.

trial registrationNCT00866099.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEducation, Medical, ContinuingFamily PracticeHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareCaregiversClinical CompetenceDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDecision Support TechniquesDementiaEarly DiagnosisEnglandEvidence-Based MedicineGuideline AdherenceHumans

Identifiers

PMID20146803
PMCPMC2829558
OpenAlexW2161392817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.