ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2010
Multiple-mouse MRI with multiple arrays of receive coils.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multianimal Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Tumor Measurements in Pancreatic Cancer Mouse Models.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2026Article
- Mouse Cardiovascular Imaging.Current protocols · 2024Review
- Feasibility of multianimal hyperpolarized (13) C MRS.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2015Article
- A throughput-optimized array system for multiple-mouse MRI.NMR in biomedicine · 2013Article
- Functional and morphological cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of mice using a cryogenic quadrature radiofrequency coil.PloS one · 2012Article
- Accelerating cine-MR imaging in mouse hearts using compressed sensing.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2011Article
- INTERCOMPARISON OF PERFORMANCE OF RF COIL GEOMETRIES FOR HIGH FIELD MOUSE CARDIAC MRI.Concepts in magnetic resonance. Part A, Bridging education and research · 2011Article
- Accelerated cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the mouse using an eight-channel array at 9.4 Tesla.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Compared to traditional single-animal imaging methods, multiple-mouse MRI has been shown to dramatically improve imaging throughput and reduce the potentially prohibitive cost for instrument access. To date, up to a single radiofrequency coil has been dedicated to each animal being simultaneously scanned, thus limiting the sensitivity, flexibility, and ultimate throughput. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of multiple-mouse MRI with a phased-array coil dedicated to each animal. A dual-mouse imaging system, consisting of a pair of two-element phased-array coils, was developed and used to achieve acceleration factors greater than the number of animals scanned at once. By simultaneously scanning two mice with a retrospectively gated cardiac cine MRI sequence, a 3-fold acceleration was achieved with signal-to-noise ratio in the heart that is equivalent to that achieved with an unaccelerated scan using a commercial mouse birdcage coil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.