Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20146049›Full record

ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2010

[Tumors of the lower gastrointestinal tract : Indication and extent of lymph node dissection].

S Merkel, K Weber, A Perrakis, J Göhl, W Hohenberger

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Is there a disadvantage to radical lymph node dissection in colon cancer?International journal of colorectal disease · 2013
    Article
  3. [Principles and technique of lymph node dissection in colorectal carcinoma].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S MerkelChirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Deutschland.
K Weber
A Perrakis
J Göhl
W Hohenberger
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymph node dissection is almost always indicated in the treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma with curative intent. Investigation of at least 12 regional lymph nodes is required for adequate staging. The extent and quality of lymph node dissection influence the long-term prognosis, especially locoregional recurrences and long-term survival. The extent of lymphadenectomy depends on the tumour site and the pattern of potential lymphatic spread following the course of the blood vessels supplying the tumour. Important principles are central ligation of the supplying arteries and draining veins right at their roots, preservation of autonomous nerves at the trunk of the superior mesenteric artery and the aorta and preservation of the integrity of the mesocolon or mesorectum. The number of regional lymph nodes examined as well as the number of lymph nodes with metastases influence the prognosis. Systematic lymph node dissection is also recommended for carcinomas of the small bowel and in most neuroendocrine tumours or carcinomas but is not required for gastro-intestinal stromal tumours.

Indexed as

Lymph Node ExcisionArteriesColorectal NeoplasmsHumansIntestinal NeoplasmsIntestine, SmallLymphatic MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingNeuroendocrine TumorsPrognosisSurvival RateVeins

Identifiers

PMID20146049
OpenAlexW1496935347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.