ArticleWorld journal of surgery2010
Different sites and prognoses of gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: report of 187 cases.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: a single unit experience in the era of targeted drug therapy.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2012Trial
- Single-incision transgastric resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors in anatomically challenging locations.Surgery today · 2023Article
- Inflammation-related indicators to distinguish between gastric stromal tumors and leiomyomas: A retrospective study.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- A Retrospective Study of Postoperative Outcomes in 98 Patients Diagnosed with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) of the Upper, Middle, and Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Between 2009 and 2019 at a Single Center in Poland.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021Article
- Clinicopathological features and prognosis of coexistence of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor and gastric cancer.Medicine · 2016Article
- Clinicopathological features and prognosis of small gastrointestinal stromal tumors outside the stomach.Oncology letters · 2015Article
- Histopathological Features of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors and the Contribution of DOG1 Expression to the Diagnosis.Balkan medical journal · 2015Article
- Prognostic angiogenic markers (endoglin, VEGF, CD31) and tumor cell proliferation (Ki67) for gastrointestinal stromal tumors.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Article
- Diagnosis and surgical treatment of esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Article
- Synchronous occurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumors and other digestive tract malignancies in the elderly.Oncotarget · 2015Article
- Clinical presentations of gastric small gastrointestinal stromal tumors mimics functional dyspepsia symptoms.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Article
- Prognostic analysis of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor with synchronous gastric cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2014Article
- Prognositic factors and clinicopathologic characteristics of small gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the stomach: a retrospective analysis of 31 cases in one center.Cancer biology & medicine · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe stomach is the most common site of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), but the clinical behavior of gastric GISTs at different sites is unclear. This study was designed to evaluate the clinicopathological (CP) parameters and influence of different gastric sites on outcome in patients with GIST.
methodsThe CP and follow-up records of 187 patients with GIST who were treated at TianJin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital between January 1985 and December 2006 were reviewed. There were 97 men and 90 women (aged 17-88 (median, 56.5) years). CP factors were assessed for overall survival (OS) by using univariate and multivariate analysis.
resultsThe numbers of cases of upper, middle, and lower third gastric GISTs were 69 (36.9%), 103 (55.1%), and 15 (8%), respectively. Sites of GISTs in the middle or upper stomach, tumor size, intermediate- or high-risk groups, high mitotic count, and low resection status were associated with poor OS (p = 0.041, 0.046, 0.006, 0.000, 0.000, respectively) in a univariate analysis. In a multivariate analysis, tumor location in the upper and middle third of the stomach (p = 0.035), an intermediate or high risk (p = 0.01), and incomplete resection status (p = 0.006) were predictive of poor OS.
conclusionsPatients in intermediate- and high-risk groups had an unfavorable outcome. A complete resection is the most important treatment for survival. The location of GIST in the lower third of the stomach may be a favorable factor, and the significance of different tumor sites for prognosis of gastric GISTs needs to be further clarified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20145924What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.