ArticleOphthalmic research2010
A promising therapeutic approach for treatment of posterior uveitis: recombinant T cell receptor ligand protects Lewis rats from acute and recurrent experimental autoimmune uveitis.
Article in Ophthalmic research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The future of uveitis treatment.Ophthalmology · 2014Review
- Effective Arrestin-Specific Immunotherapy of Experimental Autoimmune Uveitis with RTL: A Prospect for Treatment of Human Uveitis.Translational vision science & technology · 2013Article
- Neuroprotective effects of recombinant T-cell receptor ligand in autoimmune optic neuritis in HLA-DR2 mice.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2012Article
- Systemic immunotherapy delays photoreceptor cell loss and prevents vascular pathology in Royal College of Surgeons rats.Molecular vision · 2012Article
- Peptide-MHC-based nanovaccines for the treatment of autoimmunity: a "one size fits all" approach?Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionChronic autoimmune uveitis is a major cause of vision loss from intraocular inflammation in humans. In this study we report that a recombinant TCR ligand (RTL220) composed of the alpha1 and beta1 domains of MHC class II molecules linked to the uveitogenic interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP) 1177-1191 peptide is effective in the suppression of acute and recurrent experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU). MATERIAL AND
methodsEAU was induced with IRBP1177-1191 peptide or by adoptive transfer of specific T cells in Lewis rats. The rats received 5 doses of RTL220 subcutaneously every other day starting at the onset of clinic signs of EAU.
resultsThe administration of RTL220 resulted in a delayed onset and a significant amelioration of the disease severity at clinical levels and showed protection of the retina from inflammatory damage at histological levels. In treatment of recurrent EAU, RTL220 administrated at the first or second onset of clinical disease significantly inhibited EAU, modulated immune responses and provided protection from relapses of uveitis. The systemic and local proinflammatory cytokines were significantly reduced, including IL-17. There was local and systemic increase in IL-10 and reduction in the expression of the proinflammatory chemokines CCL2, CCL3 and CCL5.
conclusionsOur studies demonstrate a successful treatment of acute and recurrent EAU with RTL220, which effectively suppressed the recurrence of inflammation and reversed clinical and histological EAU by altering cytokine and chemokine expression. These findings strongly support a possible clinical application of this novel class of peptide/MHC class II drugs for patients with autoimmune uveitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.