Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20144387›Full record

ReviewJournal of diabetes science and technology2009

Glycemic control in the medical intensive care unit.

Michelle A Kovalaske, Gunjan Y Gandhi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04765982 (Does Insulin Requirement Post Cardiac Surgery Predicts The Risk Of Developing Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04765982 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Does Insulin Requirement Post Cardiac Surgery Predicts The Risk Of Developing Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorHamad Medical CorporationRan2021 to 2023Enrolled100ConditionsDiabetes, Pre-diabetesArmsChecking diabetes development in follow up at 3 month
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Noninvasive glucose detection in exhaled breath condensate.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2019
    Review
  5. Liraglutide as an Alternative to Insulin for Glycemic Control in Intensive Care Unit: A Randomized, Open-label, Clinical Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Glycemic control in critically ill patients.World journal of critical care medicine · 2012
    Review
  10. Tight glycemic control and cardiovascular effects in type 2 diabetic patients.Heart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart Association
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michelle A KovalaskeMayo Clinic Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Jacksonville, Florida 32224, USA.
Gunjan Y Gandhi
WinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyperglycemia in the critically ill is a well-known phenomenon, even in those without known diabetes. The stress response is due to a complex interplay between counter-regulatory hormones, cytokines, and changes in insulin sensitivity. Illness/infection, overfeeding, medications (e.g., corticosteroids), insufficient insulin, and/or volume depletion can be additional contributors. Acute hyperglycemia can adversely affect fluid balance (through glycosuria and dehydration), immune and endothelial function, inflammation, and outcome. While there are several insulin infusion protocols that are able to safely and effectively treat hyperglycemia, the bulk of accumulated evidence does not support a causal relationship between acute hyperglycemia and adverse outcomes in the medical intensive care unit. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials suggests there is no benefit to tightening glucose control to normal levels compared to a reasonable and achievable goal of 140 to 180 mg/dl. There is a significantly increased risk of hypoglycemia. Although there is some evidence that patients without known diabetes have worse outcomes than those with known diabetes, more recent evidence is conflicting. Glycemic control in critically ill patients should not be neglected, as studies have not tested tight versus no/poor control, but tight versus good control. A moderate approach to managing critical illness hyperglycemia seems most prudent at this juncture. Future research should ascertain whether there are certain subgroups of patients that would benefit from tighter glycemic goals. It also remains to be seen if tight glucose control is beneficial once hypoglycemia is minimized with technological advances such as continuous glucose monitoring systems.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessInsulin Infusion SystemsBlood GlucoseCost-Benefit AnalysisCritical CareDiabetes MellitusHealth Care CostsHumansHyperglycemiaHypoglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinPractice Guidelines as TopicPredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID20144387
PMCPMC2787033
OpenAlexW2122866197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.