Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20144363›Full record

ReviewJournal of diabetes science and technology2009

The role of immunomodulation therapy in autoimmune diabetes.

Johnny Ludvigsson, Linköping Diabetes Immune Intervention Study Group

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Vaccine for Diabetes-Where Do We Stand?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Role of immune system modulation in prevention of type 1 diabetes mellitus.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2012
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Vaccination against type 1 diabetes.Journal of internal medicine · 2011
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johnny LudvigssonDivision of Pediatrics and Diabetes Research Centre, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Sweden. Johnny.ludvigsson@lio.se
Linköping Diabetes Immune Intervention Study Group
Linköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type 1 diabetes (T1DM) is characterized by loss of virtually all endogenous insulin secretion. If residual insulin secretion is preserved, this will lead to improved metabolic balance, less acute and late complications, improved quality of life, and, in case of pronounced improvement of residual insulin secretion, complete remission and even cure of the disease. Immune suppression or immune modulation have been demonstrated as a proof of principle to stop/decrease the destructive process and thereby preserve beta-cell function. Several methods to save residual beta-cell function have been tried for more than three decades with little or no evidence of efficacy. Positive effects have been seen mainly in adult patients but have been minimal or absent in children with diabetes. Furthermore, the safety of these immune interventions and/or their benefit to risk relationships have not been found to justify clinical use. More specific immune modulation with anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies has resulted in more encouraging postponement of C-peptide decline, but with frequent and serious adverse effects. Still more promising are the autoantigen therapies, of which glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) vaccination has shown significant preservation of residual insulin secretion in 10-18-year-old type 1 diabetes patients with recent onset. Efficacy was most impressive in the subgroup of patients with diabetes of short duration (<3 months). The treatment was simple, well tolerated, and showed no treatment-related adverse events. If these results can be confirmed, there is a realistic hope that GAD vaccination, perhaps in combination with vaccinations with other autoantigens and/or other therapies, will result in remission for some patients. The prospects of cure and prevention of T1DM will become less remote.

Indexed as

ImmunomodulationAdolescentAdultAutoantibodiesAutoantigensBlood GlucoseCD3 ComplexChildChild, PreschoolClinical Trials as TopicC-PeptideDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Glutamate DecarboxylaseGlycated HemoglobinHumansInsulinAutoantibodiesAutoantigensBlood GlucoseCD3 ComplexC-PeptideGlutamate DecarboxylaseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanInsulin

Identifiers

PMID20144363
PMCPMC2771520
OpenAlexW2111433522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.