ReviewJournal of diabetes science and technology2009
Single walled carbon nanotubes as reporters for the optical detection of glucose.
Review in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glucose Oxidase Coupling with Pistol-Like DNAzyme Based Colorimetric Assay for Sensitive Glucose Detection in Tears and Saliva.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Bibliometric analysis of research on the utilization of nanotechnology in diabetes mellitus and its complications.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2024Article
- Future Prospects for Clinical Applications of Nanocarbons Focusing on Carbon Nanotubes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- Angiogenesis in the Avian Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane: A Perspective on Research Trends and a Case Study on Toxicant Vascular Effects.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2020Review
- Nanomedicine-Based Strategies for Diabetes: Diagnostics, Monitoring, and Treatment.Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2020Review
- The Progress of Glucose Monitoring-A Review of Invasive to Minimally and Non-Invasive Techniques, Devices and Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Ubiquitin immobilized on mesoporous MCM41 silica surfaces - Analysis by solid-state NMR with biophysical and surface characterization.Biointerphases · 2017Article
- Noninvasive Monitoring of Blood Glucose with Raman Spectroscopy.Accounts of chemical research · 2017Article
- Options for the Development of Noninvasive Glucose Monitoring: Is Nanotechnology an Option to Break the Boundaries?Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2016Review
- Overcoming the aggregation problem: a new type of fluorescent ligand for ConA-based glucose sensing.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2015Article
- Effect of Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Tissue Implantation on the Chick Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane: Morphometric Measurements and Vascularity.BioMed research international · 2015Article
- Managing diabetes with nanomedicine: challenges and opportunities.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2015Review
- Article
- A MEMS differential viscometric sensor for affinity glucose detection in continuous glucose monitoring.Journal of micromechanics and microengineering : structures, devices, and systems · 2013Article
- Single-walled carbon nanotube-based near-infrared optical glucose sensors toward in vivo continuous glucose monitoring.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2013Review
- Overview of fluorescence glucose sensing: a technology with a bright future.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2012Review
- Diabetes treatment in 2025: can scientific advances keep pace with prevalence?Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2012Article
- Nanosensors and nanomaterials for monitoring glucose in diabetes.Trends in molecular medicine · 2010Review
- Technologies for continuous glucose monitoring: current problems and future promises.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2010Review
- Transcutaneous glucose sensing by surface-enhanced spatially offset Raman spectroscopy in a rat model.Analytical chemistry · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article reviews current efforts to make glucose sensors based on the inherent optical properties of single walled carbon nanotubes. The advantages of single walled carbon nanotubes over traditional organic and nanoparticle fluorophores for in vivo-sensing applications are discussed. Two recent glucose sensors made by our group are described, with the first being an enzyme-based glucose sensor that couples a reaction mediator, which quenches nanotube fluorescence, on the surface of the nanotube with the reaction of the enzyme. The second sensor is based on competitive equilibrium binding between dextran-coated nanotubes and concanavalin A. The biocompatibility of a model sensor is examined using the chicken embryo chorioallantoic membrane as a tissue model. The advantages of measuring glucose concentration directly, like most optical sensors, versus measuring the flux in glucose concentration, like most electrochemical sensors, is discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.