ReviewJournal of diabetes science and technology2009
The case for personalized medicine.
Review in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Treating Cardiovascular Disorders with Personalized Medicine.Cardiovascular & hematological disorders drug targets · 2025Review
- Bayesian group sequential enrichment designs based on adaptive regression of response and survival time on baseline biomarkers.Biometrics · 2022Article
- Molecular Probes, Chemosensors, and Nanosensors for Optical Detection of Biorelevant Molecules and Ions in Aqueous Media and Biofluids.Chemical reviews · 2022Review
- Data Integration Challenges for Machine Learning in Precision Medicine.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- Review
- Vantage sensitivity: a framework for individual differences in response to psychological intervention.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2018Review
- Guidance for pharmacogenomic biomarker testing in labels of FDA-approved drugs.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2015Article
- Pharmacogenetics research on chemotherapy resistance in colorectal cancer over the last 20 years.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Review
- The personalized medicine for diabetes meeting summary report.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Personalized medicine may be considered an extension of traditional approaches to understanding and treating disease, but with greater precision. Physicians may now use a patient's genetic variation or expression profile as well as protein and metabolic markers to guide the selection of certain drugs or treatments. In many cases, the information provided by molecular markers predicts susceptibility to conditions. The added precision introduces the possibility of a more preventive, effective approach to clinical care and reductions in the duration and cost of clinical trials. Here, we make the case, through real-world examples, that personalized medicine is delivering significant value to individuals, to industry, and to the health care system overall and that it will continue to grow in importance if we can lift the barriers that impede its adoption and build incentives to encourage its practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.