Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20144246›Full record

Trial reportBMC gastroenterology2010

A candidate probiotic with unfavourable effects in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome: a randomised controlled trial.

Solveig C Ligaarden, Lars Axelsson, Kristine Naterstad, Stian Lydersen, Per G Farup

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC gastroenterology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00355810 (Lactobacillus Plantarum MF 1298 vs Placebo for Irritable Bowel Syndrome.), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00355810 nacompletednot on this map

Lactobacillus Plantarum MF 1298 vs Placebo for Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyRan2006 to 2006Enrolled19ConditionsFunctional Gastrointestinal Disorders, Irritable Bowel SyndromeArmsplacebo followed by Lactobacillus plantarum MF 1298, Lactobacillus plantarum MF1298 followed by placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Guideline
  10. Safety ofNutrients · 2026
    Trial
  11. Efficacy and dose response ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2023
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. A Meta-analysis of the Effect of ProbioticMedeniyet medical journal · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Solveig C LigaardenDepartment of Medicine, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Gjøvik, Norway. solveig.ligaarden@ntnu.no
Lars Axelsson
Kristine Naterstad
Stian Lydersen
Per G Farup

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome probiotics have shown efficacy for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Lactobacillus (L.) plantarum MF1298 was found to have the best in vitro probiotic properties of 22 strains of lactobacilli. The aim of this study was to investigate the symptomatic effect of L. plantarum MF1298 in subjects with IBS. Primary outcome was treatment preference and secondary outcomes were number of weeks with satisfactory relief of symptoms and IBS sum score.

methodsThe design was a randomised double blind placebo-controlled crossover trial. 16 subjects with IBS underwent two three-week periods of daily intake of one capsule of 10(10) CFU L. plantarum MF 1298 or placebo separated by a four-week washout period.

resultsThirteen participants (81%; 95% CI 57% to 93%; P = 0.012) preferred placebo to L. plantarum MF1298 treatment. The mean (SD) number of weeks with satisfactory relief of symptoms in the periods with L. plantarum MF1298 and placebo were 0.50 (0.89) and 1.44 (1.26), respectively (P = 0.006). IBS sum score was 6.44 (1.81) in the period with L. plantarum MF1298 treatment compared with 5.35 (1.77) in the period with placebo (P = 0.010). With a clinically significant difference in the IBS sum score of 2 in disfavour of active treatment, the number needed to harm was 3.7, 95% CI 2.3 to 10.9.

conclusionsThis trial shows for the first time an unfavourable effect on symptoms in subjects with IBS after intake of a potential probiotic.

Indexed as

Lactiplantibacillus plantarumAbdominal PainAdultAgedConstipationDiarrheaFecesFemaleHumansIrritable Bowel SyndromeMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionProbioticsSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID20144246
PMCPMC2831047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.