Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20144017›Full record

ReviewClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2010

Review of meningococcal group B vaccines.

Dan M Granoff

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
20.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 189 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Immunogenicity ofMembranes · 2023
    Article
  5. Clinical microbiology reviews · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Product review on the IMD serogroup B vaccine Bexsero®.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Highly Similar Sequences of Mature IgA1 Proteases fromPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. PMAP-36 reduces the innate immune response induced byCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Biological Effect ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Development of Different Methods for PreparingFrontiers in immunology · 2020
    Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dan M GranoffCenter for Immunobiology and Vaccine Development, Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute, Oakland, California, USA. dgranoff@chori.org
Developmental Studies Center · US

Funding

ZIDOVUDINE &LAMIVUDINE &NEVIRAPINE COMBINATION THERAPY IN HIV 1 INFM01RR001271 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KESSLER, DAVID A · 1985 to 2006
$22.7M
Novel vaccine strategies for prevention of N. meningitidis group B diseaseR01AI046464 · NIAID · OMVAX, INC. · PI MOE, GREGORY ROBERT · 2000 to 2024
$12.1M
CONSTRUCTION OF THE VACCINE CENTERC06RR016226 · NCRR · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL &RES CTR AT OAKLAND · PI LUCAS, ALEXANDER H. · 2002 to 2002
$2.0M
Neisseria meningitidis antigens expressed in infectionR21AI061533 · NIAID · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL &RES CTR AT OAKLAND · PI GRANOFF, DAN M. · 2004 to 2005
$440k
NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR016226NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR-16226NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR001271NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI046464NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI061533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

No broadly effective vaccines are available for prevention of group B meningococcal disease, which accounts for >50% of all cases. The group B capsule is an autoantigen and is not a suitable vaccine target. Outer-membrane vesicle vaccines appear to be safe and effective, but serum bactericidal responses in infants are specific for a porin protein, PorA, which is antigenically variable. To broaden protection, outer-membrane vesicle vaccines have been prepared from >1 strain, from mutants with >1 PorA, or from mutants with genetically detoxified endotoxin and overexpressed desirable antigens, such as factor H binding protein. Also, recombinant protein vaccines such as factor H binding protein, given alone or in combination with other antigens, are in late-stage clinical development and may be effective against the majority of group B strains. Thus, the prospects have never been better for developing vaccines for prevention of meningococcal disease, including that caused by group B strains.

Indexed as

Antigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsBiomedical ResearchEndotoxinsHumansMeningitis, MeningococcalMeningococcal VaccinesNeisseria meningitidis, Serogroup BPorinsSecretory VesiclesAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsEndotoxinsfactor H-binding protein, Neisseria meningitidisMeningococcal Vaccinesporin protein, NeisseriaPorins

Identifiers

PMID20144017
PMCPMC2820413
OpenAlexW2168829270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.