Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20143954›Full record

ArticleStem cells and development2010

Subfractionation of differentiating human embryonic stem cell populations allows the isolation of a mesodermal population enriched for intermediate mesoderm and putative renal progenitors.

S Adelia Lin, Gabriel Kolle, Sean M Grimmond, Qi Zhou, Elizabeth Doust, Melissa H Little, Bruce Aronow, Sharon D Ricardo, Martin F Pera, John F Bertram and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells and development, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Human reconstructed kidney models.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Kidney Organoids: A Translational Journey.Trends in molecular medicine · 2017
    Review
  6. Does Renal Repair Recapitulate Kidney Development?Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2017
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Making new kidneys: On the road from science fiction to science fact.Current opinion in organ transplantation · 2016
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Bioengineering kidneys for transplantation.Seminars in nephrology · 2014
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Recreating kidney progenitors from pluripotent cells.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2014
    Review
  19. Stem cells: potential and challenges for kidney repair.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2014
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

S Adelia LinDepartment of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Gabriel Kolle
Sean M Grimmond
Qi Zhou
Elizabeth Doust
Melissa H Little
Bruce Aronow
Sharon D Ricardo
Martin F Pera
John F Bertram
Andrew L Laslett
Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AUThe University of Queensland · AUTechnologies pour la Santé · FRCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Towards renal regenerationR01DK063400 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND · PI LITTLE, MELISSA HELEN · 2002 to 2004
$2.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK63400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human embryonic stem (ES) cells are pluripotent and are believed to be able to generate all cell types in the body. As such, they have potential applications in regenerative therapy for kidney disease. However, before this can be achieved, a protocol to differentiate human ES cells to mesodermal renal progenitor lineages is required. Reduction of serum concentration and feeder layer density reduction cultures were used to differentiate human ES cells for 14 days. Differentiated ES cells were then fractionated by flow cytometry based on expression of the markers CD24, podocalyxin, and GCTM2 to isolate putative renal cells. These cells up-regulated the expression of the renal transcription factors PAX2, LHX1, and WT1 when compared with unfractionated human ES cells. Immunohistochemical assays confirmed that a subset of cells within this fraction co-expressed nuclear WT1 and PAX2 proteins. Transcriptome profiling also showed that the most differentially up-regulated genes in this fraction preferentially associated with kidney development in comparison with any other lineage. When compared with a transcriptome profile database of urogenital development (GUDMAP), the top 200 differentially up-regulated genes in this fraction strongly clustered into a group of genes associated with the metanephric mesenchyme at E11.5 and the corticonephrogenic interstitium at E15.5 of murine kidney development. Hence, this approach confirms an ability to direct human ES cells toward a renal progenitor state.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCell LineageKidneyAnimalsCells, CulturedCell SeparationEmbryonic Stem CellsGene ExpressionHumansMaleMesodermMiceMice, SCIDMicroarray AnalysisStem Cell TransplantationTeratoma

Identifiers

PMID20143954
PMCPMC3143417
OpenAlexW2074496097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.