Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20143325›Full record

ArticleCancer2010

The role of socioeconomic status in adjustment after ductal carcinoma in situ.

Janet S de Moor, Ann H Partridge, Eric P Winer, Jennifer Ligibel, Karen M Emmons

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Financial Hardship Associated With Cancer in the United States: Findings From a Population-Based Sample of Adult Cancer Survivors.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016
    Article
  5. Partnership Status and Socioeconomic Factors in Relation to Health Behavior Changes after a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2016
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Janet S de Moorthe Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, Ohio, USA. jdemoor@cph.osu.edu
Ann H Partridge
Eric P Winer
Jennifer Ligibel
Karen M Emmons
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHarvard University · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Variation in Receptor Tyrosine Kinases and Breast Cancer RiskP50CA089393 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI WINER, ERIC P · 2000 to 2009
$28.8M
Harvard Education Program in Cancer Prevention Control (R25T)R25CA057711 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI DAVISON, KIRSTEN · 1992 to 2018
$8.5M
Dissemination Research to Reduce Cancer DisparitiesK05CA124415 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI EMMONS, KAREN M. · 2007 to 2011
$810k
NCI NIH HHS 5K05CA124415-02NCI NIH HHS 5 P50 CA89393-03NCI NIH HHS 5R25CA057711-15NCI NIH HHS K05 CA124415NCI NIH HHS P50 CA089393NCI NIH HHS R25 CA057711
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA large body of literature suggests that socioeconomic status (SES) is positively associated with mental and physical health. However, little research has examined the impact of SES on psychological adjustment after a major stressor. The current study examined whether SES (education and financial status) was associated with distress (anxiety and depression) in women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). This study also explored whether social support explained the association between SES and distress and whether social support buffered the impact of low SES on distress.

methodsA total of 487 women with newly diagnosed DCIS were enrolled in the study. Participants completed questions about sociodemographic, psychosocial, and clinical characteristics at the time of enrollment and 9 months after their diagnosis.

resultsFinancial status was inversely associated with anxiety and depression at the 9-month follow-up. Financial status also predicted change in anxiety and depression. Women with high financial status reported a decline in anxiety and depression during the study period, whereas women with medium or low financial status reported an increase in anxiety and depression. In addition, the probability of exceeding the screening threshold suggestive of clinical depression increased with decreasing financial status. Education was not associated with anxiety or depression. The presence of social support did not explain the association between financial status and change in distress. Social support did not buffer the effect of low SES on anxiety and depression.

conclusionsWomen with medium or low SES were vulnerable to escalating anxiety and depression after a DCIS diagnosis.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalSocial ClassAnxietyBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingDepressionEconomicsEducational StatusFemaleHumansMarital StatusMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID20143325
PMCPMC3072709
OpenAlexW2054813797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.