ReviewPhotosynthesis research2010
Inorganic sulfur oxidizing system in green sulfur bacteria.
Review in Photosynthesis research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metabolic cross-feeding interactions modulate the dynamic community structure in microbial fuel cell under variable organic loading wastewaters.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Changes in the structure of the microbial community within the phycospheric microenvironment and potential biogeochemical effects induced in the demise stage of green tides caused byFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Microbial communities related to the sulfur cycle in the Sansha Yongle Blue Hole.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Direct interspecies electron transfer enables anaerobic oxidation of sulfide to elemental sulfur coupled with COiScience · 2023Article
- Distribution and Activity of Sulfur-Metabolizing Bacteria along the Temperature Gradient in Phototrophic Mats of the Chilean Hot Spring Porcelana.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Cold Sulfur Springs-Neglected Niche for Autotrophic Sulfur-Oxidizing Bacteria.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Comparative Genomic Analysis of Cold-Water Coral-DerivedMarine drugs · 2023Article
- Comparative genomic insights into habitat adaptation of coral-associatedFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- A deep-sea sulfate-reducing bacterium generates zero-valent sulfur via metabolizing thiosulfate.mLife · 2022Article
- Metagenomic insights into the functions of microbial communities in sulfur-rich sediment of a shallow-water hydrothermal vent off Kueishan Island.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Remarkably coherent population structure for a dominant Antarctic Chlorobium species.Microbiome · 2021Article
- Rubredoxin from the green sulfur bacterium Chlorobaculum tepidum donates a redox equivalent to the flavodiiron protein in an NAD(P)H dependent manner via ferredoxin-NAD(P)Archives of microbiology · 2021Article
- Physiology, Taxonomy, and Sulfur Metabolism of the Sulfolobales, an Order of Thermoacidophilic Archaea.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- A novel bacterial thiosulfate oxidation pathway provides a new clue about the formation of zero-valent sulfur in deep sea.The ISME journal · 2020Article
- Flavodoxin with an air-stable flavin semiquinone in a green sulfur bacterium.Photosynthesis research · 2019Article
- Physiological Studies ofmBio · 2018Article
- Kinetics of NADPPhotosynthesis research · 2016Article
- Shifting the metallocentric molybdoenzyme paradigm: the importance of pyranopterin coordination.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2015Review
- Article
- Structure analysis and characterization of the cytochrome c-554 from thermophilic green sulfur photosynthetic bacterium Chlorobaculum tepidum.Photosynthesis research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Green sulfur bacteria use various reduced sulfur compounds such as sulfide, elemental sulfur, and thiosulfate as electron donors for photoautotrophic growth. This article briefly summarizes what is known about the inorganic sulfur oxidizing systems of these bacteria with emphasis on the biochemical aspects. Enzymes that oxidize sulfide in green sulfur bacteria are membrane-bound sulfide-quinone oxidoreductase, periplasmic (sometimes membrane-bound) flavocytochrome c sulfide dehydrogenase, and monomeric flavocytochrome c (SoxF). Some green sulfur bacteria oxidize thiosulfate by the multienzyme system called either the TOMES (thiosulfate oxidizing multi-enzyme system) or Sox (sulfur oxidizing system) composed of the three periplasmic proteins: SoxB, SoxYZ, and SoxAXK with a soluble small molecule cytochrome c as the electron acceptor. The oxidation of sulfide and thiosulfate by these enzymes in vitro is assumed to yield two electrons and result in the transfer of a sulfur atom to persulfides, which are subsequently transformed to elemental sulfur. The elemental sulfur is temporarily stored in the form of globules attached to the extracellular surface of the outer membranes. The oxidation pathway of elemental sulfur to sulfate is currently unclear, although the participation of several proteins including those of the dissimilatory sulfite reductase system etc. is suggested from comparative genomic analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.