Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20142817›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2010

Sudden cardiac death: epidemiology and risk factors.

A Selcuk Adabag, Russell V Luepker, Véronique L Roger, Bernard J Gersh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 192 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
192citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

192 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cardioprotective and Antioxidant Effects of Marine-DerivedPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

132 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A Selcuk AdabagDivision of Cardiology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA. adaba001@umn.edu
Russell V Luepker
Véronique L Roger
Bernard J Gersh

Funding

Minnesota Heart Survey-RenewalR01HL023727 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI LUEPKER, RUSSELL V · 1985 to 2009
$10.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS 5 R01 HL023727NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL023727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is an important public-health problem with multiple etiologies, risk factors, and changing temporal trends. Substantial progress has been made over the past few decades in identifying markers that confer increased SCD risk at the population level. However, the quest for predicting the high-risk individual who could be a candidate for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, or other therapy, continues. In this article, we review the incidence, temporal trends, and triggers of SCD, and its demographic, clinical, and genetic risk factors. We also discuss the available evidence supporting the use of public-access defibrillators.

Indexed as

Age FactorsBiomarkersCoronary Artery DiseaseDeath, Sudden, CardiacDefibrillatorsHumansIncidenceMyocardial InfarctionPopulation SurveillanceRacial GroupsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsTime FactorsUnited StatesBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID20142817
PMCPMC5014372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.