Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20142752›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cardiovascular nursing

Time to treatment for acute coronary syndromes: the cost of indecision.

Holli A DeVon, Nancy Hogan, Amy L Ochs, Moshe Shapiro

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cardiovascular nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06861582 (Effect of Point-of-care Analysis of Ultrasensitive Troponin I on Length of Hospital Stay in Patients With Cardiac Chest Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06861582 narecruitingnot on this map

Effect of Point-of-care Analysis of Ultrasensitive Troponin I on Length of Hospital Stay in Patients With Cardiac Chest Pain: a Randomized Study (POC Troponina)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2025 to 2026Enrolled200ConditionsAcute Coronary Syndromes (ACS), Troponin I, Point-of-Care TestingArmsPoint-of-care ultrasensitive troponin testing, Laboratory-based ultrasensitive troponin testing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The AngelMed GuardianMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Holli A DeVonNiehoff School of Nursing, Loyola University Chicago, Illinois, USA. hdevon@luc.edu
Nancy Hogan
Amy L Ochs
Moshe Shapiro

Funding

Gender &Symptom Differences in Acute Coronary SyndromesR15NR008870 · NINR · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI DEVON, HOLLI A · 2004 to 2004
$207k
NINR NIH HHS R15 NR008870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND RESEARCH

objectives: Multiple sociodemographic and environmental factors have been associated with urgent treatment-seeking behaviors for patients experiencing acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). However, variables that directly affect the decision to seek care in the emergency department (ED) have been less well defined. The objective of this study was to explore the factors associated with a decision to seek care for symptoms of ACSs and to describe patient characteristics associated with time to presentation. SUBJECTS AND

methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive design was used. The nonprobability sample included 256 patients admitted to the hospital with ACSs. The study was conducted on cardiac step-down units at 2 large urban medical centers. Reasons for seeking care were elicited during structured interviews in the patient's room. These factors and other patient characteristics were treated as predictor variables in an analysis of time from symptom onset to arrival in the ED. RESULTS AND

conclusions: Five categories of decision making were identified through descriptive content analyses and were labeled new onset of chest pain, ongoing evaluation of symptom severity, symptoms other than chest pain that worsened or were unrelieved, externally motivated, and internally motivated. Median time from symptom onset to arrival in the ED was 9.5 hours for women and 6 hours for men. Patients who experienced constant pain (hazard ratio, 1.44; P =.01) and those with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (hazard ratio, 1.59; P = .004) sought treatment significantly sooner than patients with intermittent pain. Older patients sought treatment later (hazard ratio, 0.99; P = .02). Patients who are older and experience intermittent pain should be encouraged to seek emergent treatment for symptoms that may represent ACSs. New evidence of patients' decision-making processes and dangerous delay in time to treatment provides knowledge needed to counsel patients about the benefits of seeking care quickly when symptoms begin.

Indexed as

Chest PainDelayed DiagnosisPatient Acceptance of Health CareAcute Coronary SyndromeAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards Models

Identifiers

PMID20142752
PMCPMC2884185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.