Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20142428›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental medicine2010

Natural killer receptors: the burden of a name.

Henrique Veiga-Fernandes, Dimitris Kioussis, Mark Coles

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Henrique Veiga-FernandesImmunobiology Unit, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal. jhfernandes@fm.ul.pt
Dimitris Kioussis
Mark Coles
University of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A population of cells that expresses the NK cell receptor NKp46 and produces interleukin (IL)-22 have recently attracted considerable attention. The identity of these cells is still the subject of speculation, being variably defined as a novel NK cell subset or as a population containing conventional NK (cNK) cell precursors. In this issue, two studies shed light on this conundrum, demonstrating that NKp46(+) IL-22(+) cells and cNK cells belong to distinct lineages.

Indexed as

Cell LineageAnimalsCell DifferentiationInterleukin-22InterleukinsKiller Cells, NaturalMiceNatural Cytotoxicity Triggering Receptor 1Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 1, Group F, Member 3Interleukin-22InterleukinsNatural Cytotoxicity Triggering Receptor 1Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 1, Group F, Member 3Rorc protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID20142428
PMCPMC2822611
OpenAlexW2164385941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.