Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20142294›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2010

Outcomes in children after intestinal transplant.

Oliver B Lao, Patrick J Healey, James D Perkins, Simon Horslen, Jorge D Reyes, Adam B Goldin

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Variable management strategies for NEC totalis: a national survey.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2019
    Article
  6. Current treatment paradigms in pediatric short bowel syndrome.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2018
    Review
  7. Chronic Intestinal Pseudo-obstruction.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Ethics of emerging technologies and their transition to accepted practice: intestinal transplant for short bowel syndrome.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Oliver B LaoUniversity of Washington, Department of Surgery, 1959 NE Pacific St, Box 356410, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. olao@uw.edu
Patrick J Healey
James D Perkins
Simon Horslen
Jorge D Reyes
Adam B Goldin
Seattle Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Developing Data-Driven Cancer ResearchersT32CA009168 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STEPHEN M SCHWARTZ, MICHAEL Chiao-An WU · 1985 to 2026
$10.1M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009168NCI NIH HHS T32 CA09168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe survival rates after pediatric intestinal transplant according to underlying disease are unknown. The objective of our study was to describe the population of pediatric patients receiving an intestinal transplant and to evaluate survival according to specific disease condition. PATIENTS: Pediatric patients (< or =21 years of age) with intestinal failure meeting criteria for intestinal transplant were included in the study.

methodsA retrospective review of the United Network for Organ Sharing intestinal transplant database (January 1, 1991, to May 16, 2008), including all pediatric transplant centers participating in the United Network for Organ Sharing, was conducted. The main outcome measures were survival and mortality.

resultsEight hundred fifty-two children received an intestinal transplant (54% male). Median age and weight at the time of transplant were 1 year (interquartile rage: 1-5) and 10.7 kg (interquartile rage: 7.8-21.7). Sixty-nine percent of patients also received a simultaneous liver transplant. The most common diagnoses among patients who received a transplant were gastroschisis (24%), necrotizing enterocolitis (15%), volvulus (14%), other causes of short-gut syndrome (19%), functional bowel syndrome (16%), and Hirschsprung disease (7%). The Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated variation in patient survival according to diagnosis. Cox regression analysis confirmed a survival difference according to diagnosis (P < .001) and demonstrated a survival advantage for those patients listed with a diagnosis of volvulus (P < .01) compared with the reference gastroschisis. After adjusting for gender, recipient weight, and concomitant liver transplant, children with volvulus had a lower hazard ratio for survival and a lower risk of mortality.

conclusionsSurvival after intestinal transplant was associated with the underlying disease state. The explanation for these findings requires additional investigation into the differences in characteristics of the population of children with intestinal failure.

Indexed as

Child, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantIntestinal DiseasesIntestinesMaleRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID20142294
PMCPMC2854035
OpenAlexW2097854592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.