Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20141624›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2010

Regional differences in recombination hotspots between two chicken populations.

Martin G Elferink, Pieter van As, Tineke Veenendaal, Richard P M A Crooijmans, Martien A M Groenen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Parallel Genetic Origin of Foot Feathering in Birds.Molecular biology and evolution · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A survey of functional genomic variation in domesticated chickens.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2018
    Article
  17. Use of high-density SNP data to identify patterns of diversity and signatures of selection in broiler chickens.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martin G ElferinkAnimal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, the Netherlands. Martin.Elferink@wur.nl
Pieter van As
Tineke Veenendaal
Richard P M A Crooijmans
Martien A M Groenen
Wageningen University & Research · NLCentre for BioSystems Genomics · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough several genetic linkage maps of the chicken genome have been published, the resolution of these maps is limited and does not allow the precise identification of recombination hotspots. The availability of more than 3.2 million SNPs in the chicken genome and the recent advances in high throughput genotyping techniques enabled us to increase marker density for the construction of a high-resolution linkage map of the chicken genome. This high-resolution linkage map allowed us to study recombination hotspots across the genome between two chicken populations: a purebred broiler line and a broiler x broiler cross. In total, 1,619 animals from the two different broiler populations were genotyped with 17,790 SNPs.

resultsThe resulting linkage map comprises 13,340 SNPs. Although 360 polymorphic SNPs that had not been assigned to a known chromosome on chicken genome build WASHUC2 were included in this study, no new linkage groups were found. The resulting linkage map is composed of 31 linkage groups, with a total length of 3,054 cM for the sex-average map of the combined population. The sex-average linkage map of the purebred broiler line is 686 cM smaller than the linkage map of the broiler x broiler cross.

conclusionsIn this study, we present a linkage map of the chicken genome at a substantially higher resolution than previously published linkage maps. Regional differences in recombination hotspots between the two mapping populations were observed in several chromosomes near the telomere of the p arm; the sex-specific analysis revealed that these regional differences were mainly caused by female-specific recombination hotspots in the broiler x broiler cross.

Indexed as

Genetic LinkageGenetics, PopulationRecombination, GeneticAnimalsChickensChromosome MappingCrosses, GeneticFemaleGenotypeMalePolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID20141624
PMCPMC2834597
OpenAlexW2094179893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.