Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20140783›Full record

ReviewHerz2010

[Is the determination of biomarkers worth its price? Review of the literature taking brain natriuretic peptides (BNP) as an example].

Thomas Reinhold, Anne Berghöfer, Stefan N Willich

Abstract readComparative StudyEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herz, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas ReinholdInstitut für Sozialmedizin, Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsökonomie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin. thomas.reinhold@charite.de
Anne Berghöfer
Stefan N Willich
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure is an important cardiac disease with an increasing prevalence in Western societies. In addition to a significant reduction of the patient's physical capability and quality of life, cardiac insufficiency is associated with considerable expenditure by national health care systems. A number of imaging techniques are available for the detection of heart failure (e.g., echocardiography), and the use of biomarkers such as brain natriuretic peptides (BNP or NT-proBNP) becomes increasingly popular in the process of screening and diagnosis. Until now, there is a lack of information regarding health-economic aspects of this biomarker use. For this reason, a systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE including all relevant studies published up to and including August 2009. The primary objective was to summarize the main findings of all relevant investigations which focus on health-economic aspects of BNP use as well as NT-proBNP use. Out of 64 initial search results, 13 relevant studies were identified which met the inclusion criteria. Eleven studies were finally included in this literature review. Although the methodology of these studies was very heterogeneous, the majority of investigations indicate that the use of BNP and NT-proBNP, respectively, is a cost-effective procedure for heart failure diagnosis and prognosis, as well as for heart failure screening. However, keeping in mind that the transferability of economics study results is limited due to a number of differences between national health care systems, there are no investigations with a focus on the financial implications for Germany. Further research is required in this context.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCost-Benefit AnalysisEchocardiographyHeart FailureHumansNational Health ProgramsNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsPrognosisSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)

Identifiers

PMID20140783
OpenAlexW1511488930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.