Trial reportClinical oral investigations2011
Ten-year survival of ART restorations in permanent posterior teeth.
Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Survival percentages of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations and sealants in posterior teeth: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical oral investigations · 2018Pooled it
- Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis.Clinical oral investigations · 2012Pooled it
- Zirconia-reinforced glass ionomer restorations in molar incisor hypomineralization: a randomized controlled clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Trial
- A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Chemomechanical (Carie-Care™) Versus Conventional Caries Removal for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2025Trial
- Management of initial carious lesions of hypomineralized molars (MIH) with silver diamine fluoride or silver-modified atraumatic restorative treatment (SMART): 1-year results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Trial
- A prospective and randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of ART restorations with high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement versus conventional restorations with resin composite in Class II cavities of permanent teeth: two-year follow-up.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2021Trial
- Randomized clinical trial of class II restoration in permanent teeth comparing ART with composite resin after 12 months.Clinical oral investigations · 2019Trial
- One-year follow-up of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment(ART) for dental caries in children undergoing oncohematological treatment: a pragmatic trial.BMC oral health · 2015Trial
- Non-Operative, Micro- and Minimally Invasive Methods for Caries Treatment-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Novel Nanotechnology of TiOInternational journal of biomaterials · 2017Article
- Success rates of manual restorative treatment (MRT) with amalgam in permanent teeth in high caries-risk Filipino children.Clinical oral investigations · 2015Article
- pH gradient and distribution of streptococci, lactobacilli, prevotellae, and fusobacteria in carious dentine.Clinical oral investigations · 2014Article
- Effect of heat application on the mechanical behaviour of glass ionomer cements.Clinical oral investigations · 2014Article
- Article
- Minimal intervention dentistry for managing dental caries - a review: report of a FDI task group.International dental journal · 2012Review
- Twenty-five-year atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach: a comprehensive overview.Clinical oral investigations · 2012Review
- Transferring ART research into education in Brazil.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the 10-year clinical performance of high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement placed in posterior permanent teeth by means of the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach. One operator placed 167 single- and 107 multiple-surface restorations in 43 high-risk caries pregnant women (mean decayed teeth = 9.8 ± 5.5). Examinations were performed at 1-, 2-, and 10-year intervals according to ART criteria. In the last evaluation, the US Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria were also used. After 10 years, 129 restorations (47.1%) were evaluated and achieved a cumulative survival rate of 49.0% (SE 7.2%). The 10-year survival of single- and multiple-surface ART restorations assessed using the ART criteria were 65.2% (SE 7.3%) and 30.6% (SE 9.9%), respectively. This difference was significant (jackknife SE of difference; p < 0.05). Using the USPHS criteria, the 10-year survival of single- and multiple-surface ART restorations were 86.5% and 57.6%, respectively. The primary causes of failure were total loss (9.3%) and marginal defects (5.4%). The survival rates observed, especially for the single-surface restorations, confirm the potential of the ART approach for restoring and saving posterior permanent teeth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.