Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20140089›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Conduction properties distinguish unmyelinated sympathetic efferent fibers and unmyelinated primary afferent fibers in the monkey.

Matthias Ringkamp, Lisa M Johanek, Jasenka Borzan, Timothy V Hartke, Gang Wu, Esther M Pogatzki-Zahn, James N Campbell, Beom Shim, Raf J Schepers, Richard A Meyer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Characterization of silent afferents in the pelvic and splanchnic innervations of the mouse colorectum.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthias RingkampDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America. platelet@jhmi.edu
Lisa M Johanek
Jasenka Borzan
Timothy V Hartke
Gang Wu
Esther M Pogatzki-Zahn
James N Campbell
Beom Shim
Raf J Schepers
Richard A Meyer
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory · US

Funding

Research Project CoreP01NS047399 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LA MOTTE, ROBERT H · 2004 to 2013
$11.0M
NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOPHYSICAL STUDIES OF PAINR01NS014447 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, JAMES N · 1985 to 2008
$3.4M
NINDS NIH HHS NS-047399NINDS NIH HHS NS-14447NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS047399NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS014447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferent classes of unmyelinated nerve fibers appear to exhibit distinct conductive properties. We sought a criterion based on conduction properties for distinguishing sympathetic efferents and unmyelinated, primary afferents in peripheral nerves. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsIn anesthetized monkey, centrifugal or centripetal recordings were made from single unmyelinated nerve fibers in the peroneal or sural nerve, and electrical stimuli were applied to either the sciatic nerve or the cutaneous nerve endings, respectively. In centrifugal recordings, electrical stimulation at the sympathetic chain and dorsal root was used to determine the fiber's origin. In centrifugal recordings, sympathetic fibers exhibited absolute speeding of conduction to a single pair of electrical stimuli separated by 50 ms; the second action potential was conducted faster (0.61 0.16%) than the first unconditioned action potential. This was never observed in primary afferents. Following 2 Hz stimulation (3 min), activity-dependent slowing of conduction in the sympathetics (8.6 0.5%) was greater than in one afferent group (6.7 0.5%) but substantially less than in a second afferent group (29.4 1.9%). In centripetal recordings, most mechanically-insensitive fibers also exhibited absolute speeding to twin pulse stimulation. The subset that did not show this absolute speeding was responsive to chemical stimuli (histamine, capsaicin) and likely consists of mechanically-insensitive afferents. During repetitive twin pulse stimulation, mechanosensitive afferents developed speeding, and speeding in sympathetic fibers increased. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The presence of absolute speeding provides a criterion by which sympathetic efferents can be differentiated from primary afferents. The differences in conduction properties between sympathetics and afferents likely reflect differential expression of voltage-sensitive ion channels.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAdrenergic FibersAnimalsElectric StimulationMacaca fascicularisModels, NeurologicalNerve Fibers, UnmyelinatedNeural ConductionNeural PathwaysNeurons, AfferentNeurons, Efferent

Identifiers

PMID20140089
PMCPMC2816714
OpenAlexW2108067412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.