Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20139657›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology2010

Using functional data analysis models to estimate future time trends in age-specific breast cancer mortality for the United States and England-Wales.

Bircan Erbas, Muhammed Akram, Dorota M Gertig, Dallas English, John L Hopper, Anne M Kavanagh, Rob Hyndman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Time Series Analysis of Monthly Suicide Rates in West of Iran, 2006-2013.International journal of preventive medicine · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bircan ErbasSchool of Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Melbourne, Australia. bircan.erbas@gmail.com
Muhammed Akram
Dorota M Gertig
Dallas English
John L Hopper
Anne M Kavanagh
Rob Hyndman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMortality/incidence predictions are used for allocating public health resources and should accurately reflect age-related changes through time. We present a new forecasting model for estimating future trends in age-related breast cancer mortality for the United States and England-Wales.

methodsWe used functional data analysis techniques both to model breast cancer mortality-age relationships in the United States from 1950 through 2001 and England-Wales from 1950 through 2003 and to estimate 20-year predictions using a new forecasting method.

resultsIn the United States, trends for women aged 45 to 54 years have continued to decline since 1980. In contrast, trends in women aged 60 to 84 years increased in the 1980s and declined in the 1990s. For England-Wales, trends for women aged 45 to 74 years slightly increased before 1980, but declined thereafter. The greatest age-related changes for both regions were during the 1990s. For both the United States and England-Wales, trends are expected to decline and then stabilize, with the greatest decline in women aged 60 to 70 years. Forecasts suggest relatively stable trends for women older than 75 years.

conclusionsPrediction of age-related changes in mortality/incidence can be used for planning and targeting programs for specific age groups. Currently, these models are being extended to incorporate other variables that may influence age-related changes in mortality/incidence trends. In their current form, these models will be most useful for modeling and projecting future trends of diseases for which there has been very little advancement in treatment and minimal cohort effects (eg. lethal cancers).

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsCross-Cultural ComparisonData Interpretation, StatisticalEnglandFemaleForecastingHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedUnited StatesWales

Identifiers

PMID20139657
PMCPMC3900815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.