Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20139213›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2010

Presentation, pattern, and natural course of severe symptoms, and role of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance among patients presenting with suspected uncomplicated urinary tract infection in primary care: observational study.

P Little, R Merriman, S Turner, K Rumsby, G Warner, J A Lowes, H Smith, C Hawke, G Leydon, M Mullee and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Natural history of uncomplicated urinary tract infection without antibiotics: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Implications of Antibiotic Resistance for Patients' Recovery From Common Infections in the Community: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Clinical relevance of bacterial resistance in lower respiratory tract infection in primary care: secondary analysis of a multicentre European trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Point-of-care urine culture for managing urinary tract infection in primary care: a randomised controlled trial of clinical and cost-effectiveness.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

P LittlePrimary Care Medical Group, Community Clinical Sciences Division (CCS), School of Medicine, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton SO16 6ST. p.little@soton.ac.uk
R Merriman
S Turner
K Rumsby
G Warner
J A Lowes
H Smith
C Hawke
G Leydon
M Mullee
M V Moore
University of Southampton · GBBrighton and Sussex Medical School · GBCamden and Campbelltown Hospitals · AUNightingale Hospital · INSouthampton General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the natural course and the important predictors of severe symptoms in urinary tract infection and the effect of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance.

designObservational study.

settingPrimary care.

participants839 non-pregnant adult women aged 18-70 presenting with suspected urinary tract infection.

main outcome measureDuration and severity of symptoms.

results684 women provided some information on symptoms; 511 had both laboratory results and complete symptom diaries. For women with infections sensitive to antibiotics, severe symptoms, rated as a moderately bad problem or worse, lasted 3.32 days on average. After adjustment for other predictors, moderately bad symptoms lasted 56% longer (incidence rate ratio 1.56, 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 1.99, P<0.001) in women with resistant infections; 62% longer (1.62, 1.13 to 2.31, P=0.008) when no antibiotics prescribed; and 33% longer (1.33, 1.14 to 1.56, P<0.001) in women with urethral syndrome. The duration of symptoms was shorter if the doctor was perceived to be positive about diagnosis and prognosis (continuous 7 point scale: 0.91, 0.84 to 0.99; P=0.021) and longer when the woman had frequent somatic symptoms (1.03, 1.01 to 1.05, P=0.002; for each symptom), a history of cystitis, urinary frequency, and more severe symptoms at baseline.

conclusionAntibiotic resistance and not prescribing antibiotics are associated with a greater than 50% increase in the duration of more severe symptoms in women with uncomplicated urinary tract infection. Women with a history of cystitis, frequent somatic symptoms (high somatisation), and severe symptoms at baseline can be given realistic advice that they are likely to have severe symptoms lasting longer than three days.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsClinical Laboratory TechniquesDrug Resistance, MicrobialFemaleHumansMiddle AgedUrinary Tract InfectionsYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID20139213
PMCPMC2817050
OpenAlexW2130122912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.