Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20138719›Full record

ReviewMaturitas2010

Male breast cancer: an update in diagnosis, treatment and molecular profiling.

Susan Onami, Melanie Ozaki, Joanne E Mortimer, Sumanta Kumar Pal

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Maturitas, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Male breast cancer: a report of 25 cases.The Pan African medical journal · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Breast cancer risk factors.Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review · 2015
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Clinicopathologic characteristics and survival of male breast cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Invasive ductal breast carcinoma underneath a lipoma in a male patient.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2012
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Male Breast Cancer: A Rare Entity.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susan OnamiDivision of Genitourinary Malignancies, Department of Medical Oncology & Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
Melanie Ozaki
Joanne E Mortimer
Sumanta Kumar Pal

Funding

Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA001727 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER · PI MORTIMER, JOANNE E. · 1992 to 2024
$14.6M
NCI NIH HHS K12 2K12CA001727-16A1NCI NIH HHS K12 CA001727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant advances have been made in the diagnosis and treatment of female breast cancer, resulting in a decline in incidence and a global improvement in clinical outcome. The statistics for male breast cancer (MBC) stand in sharp contrast-over the past several decades, there has been a steady rise in the incidence of this disease, and clinical outcome has improved at a much slower pace. In the current review, the clinicopathologic features of MBC are described in detail. An emphasis is placed on molecular profiling of MBC, which may identify candidate biomarkers and putative targets for pharmacologic intervention. The current role of cytotoxic chemotherapy and endocrine therapy (including tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors and GnRH analogues) is defined in the context of currently available studies. Furthermore, the potential role of targeted agents, including HER2-directed therapies, PARP inhibitors, and angiogenesis inhibitors, is delineated.

Indexed as

BRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast Neoplasms, MaleCarcinomaHumansMaleRisk FactorsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 Protein

Identifiers

PMID20138719
PMCPMC3253821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.