Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20138503›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2010

Understanding biology by stretching proteins: recent progress.

Albert Galera-Prat, Angel Gómez-Sicilia, Andres F Oberhauser, Marek Cieplak, Mariano Carrión-Vázquez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nanomechanics of tip-link cadherins.Scientific reports · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. End-to-end attraction of duplex DNA.Nucleic acids research · 2012
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Protein folding at single-molecule resolution.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2011
    Review
  20. Molecular dynamics-based simulation of trace amine membrane permeability.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Albert Galera-PratInstituto Cajal, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Angel Gómez-Sicilia
Andres F Oberhauser
Marek Cieplak
Mariano Carrión-Vázquez

Funding

The Nano-mechanics of Polycystin-1R01DK073394 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI OBERHAUSER, ANDRES F. · 2006 to 2010
$1.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK073394NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK073394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single molecule manipulation techniques combined with molecular dynamics simulations and protein engineering have enabled, during the last decade, the mechanical properties of proteins to be studied directly, thereby giving birth to the field of protein nanomechanics. Recent data obtained from such techniques have helped gain insight into the structural bases of protein resistance against forced unfolding, as well as revealing structural motifs involved in mechanical stability. Also, important technical developments have provided new perspectives into protein folding. Eventually, new and exciting data have shown that mechanical properties are key factors in cell signaling and pathologies, and have been used to rationally tune these properties in a variety of proteins.

Indexed as

ProteinsBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansProtein FoldingProtein StabilityProteins

Identifiers

PMID20138503
PMCPMC2826537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.