Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20137090›Full record

Trial reportBMC pediatrics2010

Control of hyperglycaemia in paediatric intensive care (CHiP): study protocol.

Duncan Macrae, John Pappachan, Richard Grieve, Roger Parslow, Simon Nadel, Margrid Schindler, Paul Baines, Peter-Marc Fortune, Zdenek Slavik, Allan Goldman and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Critical illness hyperglycemia in pediatric cardiac surgery.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2012
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

Duncan MacraePaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK. D.macrae@rbht.nhs.uk
John Pappachan
Richard Grieve
Roger Parslow
Simon Nadel
Margrid Schindler
Paul Baines
Peter-Marc Fortune
Zdenek Slavik
Allan Goldman
Ann Truesdale
Helen Betts
Elizabeth Allen
Claire Snowdon
Deborah Percy
Michael Broadhead
Tara Quick
Mark Peters
Kevin Morris
Robert Tasker
Diana Elbourne
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBRoyal Brompton Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GBAlder Hey Children's Hospital · GBBirmingham Children's Hospital · GBBristol Royal Hospital for Children · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBRoyal Manchester Children's Hospital · GBSouthampton General Hospital · GBSt Mary's Hospital · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is increasing evidence that tight blood glucose (BG) control improves outcomes in critically ill adults. Children show similar hyperglycaemic responses to surgery or critical illness. However it is not known whether tight control will benefit children given maturational differences and different disease spectrum. METHODS/

designThe study is an randomised open trial with two parallel groups to assess whether, for children undergoing intensive care in the UK aged <or= 16 years who are ventilated, have an arterial line in-situ and are receiving vasoactive support following injury, major surgery or in association with critical illness in whom it is anticipated such treatment will be required to continue for at least 12 hours, tight control will increase the numbers of days alive and free of mechanical ventilation at 30 days, and lead to improvement in a range of complications associated with intensive care treatment and be cost effective. Children in the tight control group will receive insulin by intravenous infusion titrated to maintain BG between 4 and 7.0 mmol/l. Children in the control group will be treated according to a standard current approach to BG management. Children will be followed up to determine vital status and healthcare resources usage between discharge and 12 months post-randomisation. Information regarding overall health status, global neurological outcome, attention and behavioural status will be sought from a subgroup with traumatic brain injury (TBI). A difference of 2 days in the number of ventilator-free days within the first 30 days post-randomisation is considered clinically important. Conservatively assuming a standard deviation of a week across both trial arms, a type I error of 1% (2-sided test), and allowing for non-compliance, a total sample size of 1000 patients would have 90% power to detect this difference. To detect effect differences between cardiac and non-cardiac patients, a target sample size of 1500 is required. An economic evaluation will assess whether the costs of achieving tight BG control are justified by subsequent reductions in hospitalisation costs. DISCUSSION: The relevance of tight glycaemic control in this population needs to be assessed formally before being accepted into standard practice.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, PediatricPatient SelectionAdolescentAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolClinical ProtocolsCritical IllnessDrug MonitoringEnglandHumansHyperglycemiaInfantInfant, NewbornInfusions, IntravenousInsulinInsulinVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID20137090
PMCPMC2830203
OpenAlexW2146649942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.