ReviewJournal of clinical pathology1991
In situ hybridisation in perspective.
Review in Journal of clinical pathology, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of an In Situ Hybridization Method for Detection of Akabane Virus.Journal of biological methods · 2024Article
- A modified nick translation method used with FISH that produces reliable results with archival tissue sections.Molecular biotechnology · 2002Article
- Protein and mRNA expression of simple epithelial keratins in normal, dysplastic, and malignant oral epithelia.The American journal of pathology · 1994Article
- Detection of tumour necrosis factor alpha in sarcoidosis and tuberculosis granulomas using in situ hybridisation.Journal of clinical pathology · 1994Article
- In situ detection of human Ig light-chain mRNA on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue sections using digoxigenin-labelled RNA probes.The Histochemical journal · 1993Article
- Simultaneous in situ hybridisation of native mRNA and immunoglobulin detection by conventional immunofluorescence in paraffin wax embedded sections.Journal of clinical pathology · 1992Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the introduction to this review two questions were posed: is the technology associated with ISH ready for general use, and will the method become an important investigative tool? With the exception of the demonstration of some single and low copy sequences, non-radioactive ISH is now sufficiently developed and simplified to make it a routine technique. It is also clear that ISH will continue to have an important research role. In diagnostic pathology the technique is already providing valuable information and the present decade should see the development of many more diagnostic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.