Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20136112›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2010

Free energy profile of the interaction between a monomer or a dimer of protegrin-1 in a specific binding orientation and a model lipid bilayer.

Victor Vivcharuk, Yiannis Kaznessis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Computational studies of peptide-induced membrane pore formation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Multiscale Models of Antibiotic Probiotics.Current opinion in chemical engineering · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Dimerization of protegrin-1 in different environments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Victor VivcharukDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0132, USA.
Yiannis Kaznessis
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Lactic Acid Bacteria that Detect & Inhibit Enterococci in the Mammalian GI TractR01GM111358 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI DUNNY, GARY M, KAZNESSIS, YIANNIS · 2014 to 2017
$1.4M
Computational Modeling /Design of Antimicrobial PeptidesR01GM070989 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI KAZNESSIS, YIANNIS · 2005 to 2009
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 070989NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070989NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM111358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The free energies of adsorption of the monomer or dimer of the cationic beta-hairpin antimicrobial peptide protegrin-1 (PG1) in a specific binding orientation on a lipid bilayer are determined using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and Poisson-Boltzmann calculations. The bilayer is composed of anionic palmitoyl-oleoyl-phosphatidylglycerol (POPG) and palmitoyl-oleoyl-phosphatidylethanolamine (POPE) with ratio 1:3 (POPG/POPE). PG1 is believed to kill bacteria by binding on their membranes. There, it forms pores that lyse the bacteria. Herein we focus on the thermodynamics of binding. In particular, we explore the role of counterion release from the lipid bilayer upon adsorption of either the monomeric or the dimeric form of PG1. Twenty-two 4-ns-long MD trajectories of equilibrated systems are generated to determine the free energy profiles for the monomer and dimer as a function of the distance between the peptide(s) and the membrane surface. The MD simulations are conducted at 11 different separations from the membrane for each of the two systems, one with PG1, the second with a PG1 dimer of only a specific orientation of the monomer and dimer without taking into account the change of entropy for the peptide. To calculate the potential of mean force for each peptide/membrane system, a variant of constrained MD and thermodynamic integration is used. We observed that PG1 dimer binds more favorably to the POPG/POPE membrane. A simple method for relating the free energy profile to the PG1-membrane binding constant is employed to predict a free energy of adsorption of -2.4 +/- 0.8 kcal/mol. A corresponding PG1-dimer-membrane binding constant is calculated as -3.5 +/- 1.1 kcal/mol. Free energy profiles from MD simulation were extensively analyzed and compared with results of Poisson-Boltzmann theory. We find the peptide-membrane attraction to be dominated by the entropy increase due to the release of counterions in a POPG/POPE lipid bilayer.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalMolecular Dynamics SimulationThermodynamicsAdsorptionAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesDimerizationLipid BilayersPhosphatidylethanolaminesPhosphatidylglycerols1-palmitoyl-2-oleoylglycero-3-phosphoglycerol1-palmitoyl-2-oleoylphosphatidylethanolamineAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesLipid BilayersPhosphatidylethanolaminesPhosphatidylglycerolsprotegrin-1

Identifiers

PMID20136112
PMCPMC5330319
OpenAlexW2127188701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.