Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20135714›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2010

Recent developments in palliative chemotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic pancreas cancer.

Soley Bayraktar, Ulas Darda Bayraktar, Caio Max Rocha-Lima

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Triple approach strategy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2013
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Polycomb and the emerging epigenetics of pancreatic cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2011
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The burning question: why is smoking a risk factor for pancreatic cancer?Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Soley BayraktarDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, United States. sbayraktar@med.miami.edu
Ulas Darda Bayraktar
Caio Max Rocha-Lima
University of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In spite of advances made in the management of the other more common cancers of the gastrointestinal tract, significant progress in the treatment of pancreatic cancer remains elusive. Nearly as many deaths occur from pancreatic cancer as are diagnosed each year reflecting the poor prognosis typically associated with this disease. Until recently, the only treatment with an impact on survival was surgery. In the palliative setting, gemcitabine (Gem) has been a standard treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer since it was shown a decade ago to result in a superior clinical benefit response and survival compared with bolus 5-fluorouracil. Since then, clinical trials have explored the pharmacokinetic modulation of Gem by fixed dose administration and the combination of Gem with other cytotoxic or the biologically "targeted" agents. However, promising trial results in small phase II trials have not translated into survival improvements in larger phase III randomized trials in the advanced disease setting. Two trials have recently reported modest survival improvements with the use of combination treatment with Gem and capecitabine (United Kingdom National Cancer Research GEMCAP trial) or erlotinib (National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group PA.3 trial). This review will focus on the use of systemic therapy for advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer, summarizing the results of several recent clinical trials and discuss their implications for clinical practice. We will also discuss briefly the second-line chemotherapy options for advanced pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

Antimetabolites, AntineoplasticCapecitabineDeoxycytidineDisease ProgressionDrug TherapyFluorouracilGemcitabineHumansPalliative CarePancreatic NeoplasmsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCapecitabineDeoxycytidineFluorouracilGemcitabine

Identifiers

PMID20135714
PMCPMC2817054
OpenAlexW2128366005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.