Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20135232›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2011

A systemic proteomic analysis of Populus chloroplast by using shotgun method.

Hong-Mei Yuan, Kai-Long Li, Rui-Juan Ni, Wen-Dong Guo, Zhuo Shen, Chuan-Ping Yang, Bai-Chen Wang, Gui-Feng Liu, Chang-Hong Guo, Jing Jiang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hong-Mei YuanKey Laboratory of Forest Tree Genetic Improvement and Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, 26 Hexing Road, Harbin 150040, China.
Kai-Long Li
Rui-Juan Ni
Wen-Dong Guo
Zhuo Shen
Chuan-Ping Yang
Bai-Chen Wang
Gui-Feng Liu
Chang-Hong Guo
Jing Jiang
Northeast Forestry University · CNHarbin Normal University · CNHeilongjiang Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chloroplast is one of the most important organelles in plants. Proteomic investigations of chloroplasts have been undertaken for many herb plant species, but to date no such investigation has been reported for woody plant chloroplasts. In the present study we initiated a systematic proteomic study of Populus chloroplasts using a shotgun proteomic method. After isolation of chloroplasts and tryptic digestion of the proteins, the protein fragments were separated via HPLC using an SCX column, and the peptides were analyzed by LC-MS/MS; 119 proteins were successfully identified. Based on annotation information in the UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot database, these proteins were identified as being localized in the chloroplast thylakoid membrane, chloroplast stroma, chloroplast thylakoid lumen, and plastoglobules. Over 50% of all identified proteins were confirmed as chloroplast thylakoid proteins, and 85 are encoded by the chloroplast genome with the remaining proteins encoded by the nuclear genome. Based on functional annotation, these proteins were classified into four functional categories, including photosynthesis, redox regulation and stress, primary and secondary metabolism, transport and signaling. These data provide a valuable basis for further studies on photosynthesis in poplar species.

Indexed as

ChloroplastsChromatography, LiquidDatabases, FactualHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysMolecular Sequence DataPlant ProteinsPopulusProteomeProteomicsTandem Mass SpectrometryPlant ProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID20135232
OpenAlexW2036029303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.