Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20134490›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology2010

Top-down therapy for IBD: rationale and requisite evidence.

Geert R D'Haens

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Geert R D'HaensImelda GI Clinical Research Center, Imeldalaan 9, 2820 Bonheiden, Belgium. geert.dhaens@imelda.be
Imelda Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several trials have shown that early treatment of Crohn's disease with immunomodulators and anti-TNF agents leads to a superior clinical outcome, including healing of the mucosa, compared with standard therapy alone. Mounting evidence indicates that mucosal healing is associated with a reduced risk of complications, and a reduced need for surgeries and hospitalizations. In the SONIC trial, a combination of the standard azathioprine immunomodulator therapy and infliximab, an anti-TNF agent, had more potent anti-inflammatory effects than either drug alone in patients with Crohn's disease who had evidence of active inflammation. These findings and those from rheumatoid arthritis trials have prompted the investigation of early initiation of immunomodulator (standard or anti-TNF) therapy for Crohn's disease, in suitable patients, which has led to substantial improvements in disease management. Careful selection of patients is, however, essential given the potential risk of toxic effects from these therapies and the fact that some patients with IBD will have a favorable disease course without them. Identification of suitable patients, however, remains a challenge, as genetic, phenotypic and environmental factors have not yet been identified that can be used for routine assessment and selection is mainly based on clinical criteria.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineGastrointestinal AgentsHumansImmunologic FactorsImmunosuppressive AgentsInflammatory Bowel DiseasesGastrointestinal AgentsImmunologic FactorsImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID20134490
OpenAlexW1965221091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.