Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20134433›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2010

Construction and testing of engineered zinc-finger proteins for sequence-specific modification of mtDNA.

Michal Minczuk, Paulina Kolasinska-Zwierz, Michael P Murphy, Monika A Papworth

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Trends and prospects in mitochondrial genome editing.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Manipulating and elucidating mitochondrial gene expression with engineered proteins.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Pathogenic variants in glutamyl-tRNANature communications · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Human mitochondrial nucleases.The FEBS journal · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michal MinczukMitochondrial Biology Unit, MRC, Cambridge, UK. michal.minczuk@mrc-mbu.cam.ac.uk
Paulina Kolasinska-Zwierz
Michael P Murphy
Monika A Papworth

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105663142Medical Research Council MC_U105697135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Engineered zinc-finger proteins (ZFPs) are hybrid proteins developed to direct various effector domains (EDs) of choice to predetermined DNA sequences. They are used to alter gene expression and to modify DNA in a sequence-specific manner in vivo and in vitro. Until now, ZFPs have mostly been used to target DNA sites in nuclear genomes. This protocol describes how to adapt engineered ZFP technology to specifically modify the mammalian mitochondrial genome. The first step describes how to construct mitochondrially targeted ZFPs (mtZFPs) so that they are efficiently imported into mammalian mitochondria. In the second step, methods to test the basic properties of mtZFPs in vitro are described. Finally, we outline how the mtZFPs can be transiently transfected into mammalian cells and their mitochondrial import tested by both immunofluorescence and biochemical methods. The protocol can be completed within a week, although time-consuming DNA cloning steps may extend this.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBase SequenceDNA, MitochondrialDNA ProbesGenetic EngineeringGenome, MitochondrialMutagenesisOligodeoxyribonucleotidesPlasmidsZinc FingersDNA, MitochondrialDNA ProbesOligodeoxyribonucleotides

Identifiers

PMID20134433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.