Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20134424›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2010

Synchronous infection of SIV and HIV in vitro for virology, immunology and vaccine-related studies.

Jonah B Sacha, David I Watkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jonah B SachaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
David I Watkins

Funding

A NOVEL, LOGICAL APPROACH TO HIV VACCINE DEVELOPMENTR01AI049120 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI WATKINS, DAVID I · 2001 to 2009
$7.6M
Minigene Vaccination with Early Presented Viral ProteinsR01AI076114 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RAKASZ, EVA GIZELLA · 2007 to 2011
$3.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI049120NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI076114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of an HIV vaccine will require a more precise understanding of the immunological and virological underpinnings of HIV infection. Magnetofection, the process of magnetizing HIV by coupling it to ferrous nanoparticles and coordinating infection using a magnetic field, synchronizes the viral replication cycle at attachment while recapitulating the events of natural infection. Although spinoculation also concentrates virus onto target cells to increase infection, it does not synchronize infection. The synchronization of HIV infection in vitro facilitates the study of events in the viral replication cycle and the antiviral immune response on timelines previously impossible. Furthermore, by infecting a high percentage of cells in a short time frame, magnetofection increases the throughput of in vitro assays. Once a virus stock is generated, magnetofection of target cells is rapid, requiring only 1-2 h. Here we present a detailed protocol for this assay and review its applications for studying the immune response to HIV.

Indexed as

Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAIDS VaccinesAnimalsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesChlorocebus aethiopsHIVHumansLymphocyte ActivationSimian Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeSimian Immunodeficiency VirusVero CellsViral VaccinesVirus ReplicationAIDS VaccinesViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID20134424
PMCPMC2936483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.