Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20133779›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

Genetic contribution to individual variation in binocular rivalry rate.

Steven M Miller, Narelle K Hansell, Trung T Ngo, Guang B Liu, John D Pettigrew, Nicholas G Martin, Margaret J Wright

Abstract readTwin Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. GABAergic Inhibition Gates Perceptual Awareness During Binocular Rivalry.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Persistent states in vision break universality and time invariance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Perceptual rivalry across animal species.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Steven M MillerPerceptual and Clinical Neuroscience Group and Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, School of Psychology & Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3145, Australia. steven.miller@med.monash.edu.au
Narelle K Hansell
Trung T Ngo
Guang B Liu
John D Pettigrew
Nicholas G Martin
Margaret J Wright

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Binocular rivalry occurs when conflicting images are presented in corresponding locations of the two eyes. Perception alternates between the images at a rate that is relatively stable within individuals but that varies widely between individuals. The determinants of this variation are unknown. In addition, slow binocular rivalry has been demonstrated in bipolar disorder, a psychiatric condition with high heritability. The present study therefore examined whether there is a genetic contribution to individual variation in binocular rivalry rate. We employed the twin method and studied both monozygotic (MZ) twins (n = 128 pairs) who are genetically identical, and dizygotic (DZ) twins (n = 220 pairs) who share roughly half their genes. MZ and DZ twin correlations for binocular rivalry rate were 0.51 and 0.19, respectively. The best-fitting genetic model showed 52% of the variance in binocular rivalry rate was accounted for by additive genetic factors. In contrast, nonshared environmental influences accounted for 18% of the variance, with the remainder attributed to measurement error. This study therefore demonstrates a substantial genetic contribution to individual variation in binocular rivalry rate. The results support the vigorous pursuit of genetic and molecular studies of binocular rivalry and further characterization of slow binocular rivalry as an endophenotype for bipolar disorder.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleModels, GeneticTwins, DizygoticTwins, MonozygoticVision, BinocularVision DisparityVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID20133779
PMCPMC2823875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.