Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20133772›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

Peptide vaccines prevent tumor growth by activating T cells that respond to native tumor antigens.

Kimberly R Jordan, Rachel H McMahan, Charles B Kemmler, John W Kappler, Jill E Slansky

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Position-Scanning Peptide Libraries as Particle Immunogens for Improving CD8Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Structures suggest an approach for converting weak self-peptide tumor antigens into superagonists for CD8 T cells in cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly R JordanIntegrated Department of Immunology, University of Colorado Denver and National Jewish Health, Denver, CO 80206, USA.
Rachel H McMahan
Charles B Kemmler
John W Kappler
Jill E Slansky
University of Colorado Denver · USNational Jewish Health · US

Funding

Mouses Model for Ag.Specific Immunotherapy of CancerR01CA109560 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SLANSKY, JILL E · 2004 to 2008
$1.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS CA109560NCI NIH HHS R01 CA109560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peptide vaccines enhance the response of T cells toward tumor antigens and represent a strategy to augment antigen-independent immunotherapies of cancer. However, peptide vaccines that include native tumor antigens rarely prevent tumor growth. We have assembled a set of peptide variants for a mouse-colon tumor model to determine how to improve T-cell responses. These peptides have similar affinity for MHC molecules, but differ in the affinity of the peptide-MHC/T-cell receptor interaction with a tumor-specific T-cell clone. We systematically demonstrated that effective antitumor responses are generated after vaccination with variant peptides that stimulate the largest proportion of endogenous T cells specific for the native tumor antigen. Importantly, we found some variant peptides that strongly stimulated a specific T-cell clone in vitro, but elicited fewer tumor-specific T cells in vivo, and were not protective. The T cells expanded by the effective vaccines responded to the wild-type antigen by making cytokines and killing target cells, whereas most of the T cells expanded by the ineffective vaccines only responded to the peptide variants. We conclude that peptide-variant vaccines are most effective when the peptides react with a large responsive part of the tumor-specific T-cell repertoire.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesCell LineCell Line, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsCytotoxicity, ImmunologicFemaleHistocompatibility Antigens Class IImmunodominant EpitopesInterferon-gammaMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, TransgenicPeptide LibraryReceptors, Antigen, T-CellAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesHistocompatibility Antigens Class IImmunodominant EpitopesInterferon-gammaPeptide LibraryReceptors, Antigen, T-CellVaccines, Subunit

Identifiers

PMID20133772
PMCPMC2842066
OpenAlexW2089303146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.