Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20133665›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

Predicting strength and function for promoters of the Escherichia coli alternative sigma factor, sigmaE.

Virgil A Rhodius, Vivek K Mutalik

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Synthetic Biology Meets Machine Learning.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Expanding the genetic toolkit helps dissect a global stress response in the early-branching speciesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Rewiring the specificity of extracytoplasmic function sigma factors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Virgil A RhodiusDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, 600 16th Street, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. virgil.rhodius@ucsf.edu
Vivek K Mutalik
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF E COLI CORE RNA POLYMERASER01GM057755 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GROSS, CAROL ANNE · 1998 to 2013
$6.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM57755NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sequenced bacterial genomes provide a wealth of information but little understanding of transcriptional regulatory circuits largely because accurate prediction of promoters is difficult. We examined two important issues for accurate promoter prediction: (1) the ability to predict promoter strength and (2) the sequence properties that distinguish between active and weak/inactive promoters. We addressed promoter prediction using natural core promoters recognized by the well-studied alternative sigma factor, Escherichia coli sigma(E), as a representative of group 4 sigmas, the largest sigma group. To evaluate the contribution of sequence to promoter strength and function, we used modular position weight matrix models comprised of each promoter motif and a penalty score for suboptimal motif location. We find that a combination of select modules is moderately predictive of promoter strength and that imposing minimal motif scores distinguished active from weak/inactive promoters. The combined -35/-10 score is the most important predictor of activity. Our models also identified key sequence features associated with active promoters. A conserved "AAC" motif in the -35 region is likely to be a general predictor of function for promoters recognized by group 4 sigmas. These results provide valuable insights into sequences that govern promoter strength, distinguish active and inactive promoters for the first time, and are applicable to both in vivo and in vitro measures of promoter strength.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticAmino Acid MotifsAmino Acid SequenceBase SequenceEscherichia coliMolecular Sequence DataPromoter Regions, GeneticSigma FactorTranscription, GeneticSigma Factorsporulation-specific sigma factors

Identifiers

PMID20133665
PMCPMC2840333
OpenAlexW1969395440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.