Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20133594›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

Development of the circadian oscillator during differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells in vitro.

Kazuhiro Yagita, Kyoji Horie, Satoshi Koinuma, Wataru Nakamura, Iori Yamanaka, Akihiro Urasaki, Yasufumi Shigeyoshi, Koichi Kawakami, Shoichi Shimada, Junji Takeda and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed, 245 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Stem Cells Run Like Clockwork for Stroke Therapeutics.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A bittersweet relationship between the cell cycle, circadian clock, and diurnal fluctuations in taste.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Circadian clock-gated cell renewal controls time-dependent changes in taste sensitivity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kazuhiro YagitaDepartment of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. kyagita@anat1.med.osaka-u.ac.jp
Kyoji Horie
Satoshi Koinuma
Wataru Nakamura
Iori Yamanaka
Akihiro Urasaki
Yasufumi Shigeyoshi
Koichi Kawakami
Shoichi Shimada
Junji Takeda
Yasuo Uchiyama
Osaka University · JPKindai University · JPNagoya University · JPNational Institute of Genetics · JPJuntendo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular oscillations underlying the generation of circadian rhythmicity in mammals develop gradually during ontogenesis. However, the developmental process of mammalian cellular circadian oscillator formation remains unknown. In differentiated somatic cells, the transcriptional-translational feedback loops (TTFL) consisting of clock genes elicit the molecular circadian oscillation. Using a bioluminescence imaging system to monitor clock gene expression, we show here that the circadian bioluminescence rhythm is not detected in the mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells, and that the ES cells likely lack TTFL regulation for clock gene expression. The circadian clock oscillation was induced during the differentiation culture of mouse ES cells without maternal factors. In addition, reprogramming of the differentiated cells by expression of Sox2, Klf4, Oct3/4, and c-Myc genes, which were factors to generate induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, resulted in the re-disappearance of circadian oscillation. These results demonstrate that an intrinsic program controls the formation of the circadian oscillator during the differentiation process of ES cells in vitro. The cellular differentiation and reprogramming system using cultured ES cells allows us to observe the circadian clock formation process and may help design new strategies to understand the key mechanisms responsible for the organization of the molecular oscillator in mammals.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCircadian RhythmAnimalsBiological ClocksCell LineEmbryonic Stem CellsGene Expression RegulationKruppel-Like Factor 4Kruppel-Like Transcription FactorsLuminescenceMiceNeuronsOctamer Transcription Factor-3Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycSOXB1 Transcription FactorsTretinoinKlf4 protein, mouseKruppel-Like Factor 4Kruppel-Like Transcription FactorsMyc protein, mouseOctamer Transcription Factor-3Pou5f1 protein, mouseProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycSox2 protein, mouseSOXB1 Transcription FactorsTretinoin

Identifiers

PMID20133594
PMCPMC2840478
OpenAlexW2059698213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.