Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20133365›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2010

Sustaining reductions in catheter related bloodstream infections in Michigan intensive care units: observational study.

Peter J Pronovost, Christine A Goeschel, Elizabeth Colantuoni, Sam Watson, Lisa H Lubomski, Sean M Berenholtz, David A Thompson, David J Sinopoli, Sara Cosgrove, J Bryan Sexton and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections through quality improvement interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Peter J PronovostQuality and Safety Research Group, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 1909 Thames Street, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA. ppronovo@jhmi.edu
Christine A Goeschel
Elizabeth Colantuoni
Sam Watson
Lisa H Lubomski
Sean M Berenholtz
David A Thompson
David J Sinopoli
Sara Cosgrove
J Bryan Sexton
Jill A Marsteller
Robert C Hyzy
Robert Welsh
Patricia Posa
Kathy Schumacher
Dale Needham

Funding

Statewide Efforts to Improve Care in Intensive Care UnitUC1HS014246 · AHRQ · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PRONOVOST, PETER J · 2003 to 2004
–
AHRQ HHS 1UC1HS14246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the extent to which intensive care units participating in the initial Keystone ICU project sustained reductions in rates of catheter related bloodstream infections. Design Collaborative cohort study to implement and evaluate interventions to improve patients' safety.

settingIntensive care units predominantly in Michigan, USA.

interventionConceptual model aimed at improving clinicians' use of five evidence based recommendations to reduce rates of catheter related bloodstream infections rates, with measurement and feedback of infection rates. During the sustainability period, intensive care unit teams were instructed to integrate this intervention into staff orientation, collect monthly data from hospital infection control staff, and report infection rates to appropriate stakeholders.

main outcome measuresQuarterly rate of catheter related bloodstream infections per 1000 catheter days during the sustainability period (19-36 months after implementation of the intervention).

resultsNinety (87%) of the original 103 intensive care units participated, reporting 1532 intensive care unit months of data and 300 310 catheter days during the sustainability period. The mean and median rates of catheter related bloodstream infection decreased from 7.7 and 2.7 (interquartile range 0.6-4.8) at baseline to 1.3 and 0 (0-2.4) at 16-18 months and to 1.1 and 0 (0.0-1.2) at 34-36 months post-implementation. Multilevel regression analysis showed that incidence rate ratios decreased from 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.53 to 0.88) at 0-3 months to 0.38 (0.26 to 0.56) at 16-18 months and 0.34 (0.24-0.48) at 34-36 months post-implementation. During the sustainability period, the mean bloodstream infection rate did not significantly change from the initial 18 month post-implementation period (-1%, 95% confidence interval -9% to 7%).

conclusionsThe reduced rates of catheter related bloodstream infection achieved in the initial 18 month post-implementation period were sustained for an additional 18 months as participating intensive care units integrated the intervention into practice. Broad use of this intervention with achievement of similar results could substantially reduce the morbidity and costs associated with catheter related bloodstream infections.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsCatheter-Related InfectionsHumansInfection ControlMichigan

Identifiers

PMID20133365
PMCPMC2816728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.