Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20133332›Full record

ArticleGenome research2010

Digital transcriptome profiling from attomole-level RNA samples.

Fatih Ozsolak, Alon Goren, Melissa Gymrek, Mitchell Guttman, Aviv Regev, Bradley E Bernstein, Patrice M Milos

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Non-coding antisense transcripts: fine regulation of gene expression in cancer.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cell type-specific transcriptome profiling in mammalian brains.Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition) · 2016
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reproducibility and reliability assays of the gene expression-measurements.Journal of biological research (Thessalonike, Greece) · 2014
    Article
  13. A comparison of sperm RNA-seq methods.Systems biology in reproductive medicine · 2014
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. RNA-Seq technology and its application in fish transcriptomics.Omics : a journal of integrative biology · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Two methods for full-length RNA sequencing for low quantities of cells and single cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fatih OzsolakHelicos BioSciences Corporation, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. fatihozsolak@gmail.com
Alon Goren
Melissa Gymrek
Mitchell Guttman
Aviv Regev
Bradley E Bernstein
Patrice M Milos
Broad Institute · USHelicos Biosciences (United States) · US

Funding

The temporal reconfiguration of regulatory networks: From yeast to cancerDP1OD003958 · OD · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI REGEV, AVIV · 2008 to 2011
$3.3M
Attomole-Level High-Throughput GenomicsR44HG005279 · NHGRI · SEQLL, LLC · PI MILOS, PATRICE M · 2010 to 2012
$1.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS R44 HG005279NIH HHS DP1 OD003958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate profiling of minute quantities of RNA in a global manner can enable key advances in many scientific and clinical disciplines. Here, we present low-quantity RNA sequencing (LQ-RNAseq), a high-throughput sequencing-based technique allowing whole transcriptome surveys from subnanogram RNA quantities in an amplification/ligation-free manner. LQ-RNAseq involves first-strand cDNA synthesis from RNA templates, followed by 3' polyA tailing of the single-stranded cDNA products and direct single molecule sequencing. We applied LQ-RNAseq to profile S. cerevisiae polyA+ transcripts, demonstrate the reproducibility of the approach across different sample preparations and independent instrument runs, and establish the absolute quantitative power of this method through comparisons with other reported transcript profiling techniques and through utilization of RNA spike-in experiments. We demonstrate the practical application of this approach to define the transcriptional landscape of mouse embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells, observing transcriptional differences, including over 100 genes exhibiting differential expression between these otherwise very similar stem cell populations. This amplification-independent technology, which utilizes small quantities of nucleic acid and provides quantitative measurements of cellular transcripts, enables global gene expression measurements from minute amounts of materials and offers broad utility in both basic research and translational biology for characterization of rare cells.

Indexed as

Signal Processing, Computer-AssistedAnimalsCells, CulturedEmbryonic Stem CellsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene Expression Regulation, FungalHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMiceModels, BiologicalOsmolar ConcentrationReproducibility of ResultsRNARNA, FungalRNA, MessengerRNARNA, FungalRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID20133332
PMCPMC2847755
OpenAlexW2115018609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.