Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20132694›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2010

Outcome of knee injuries in general practice: 1-year follow-up.

Harry P A Wagemakers, Pim A J Luijsterburg, Edith M Heintjes, Marjolein Y Berger, Jan Verhaar, Bart W Koes, Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Post-traumatic knee MRI findings and associations with patient, trauma, and clinical characteristics: a subgroup analysis in primary care in the Netherlands.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Successful conservative treatment of patients with MRI-verified meniscal lesions.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Aches and pains in primary care: stay positive but critical.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Harry P A WagemakersErasmus Medical Centre, Department of General Practice, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. hpa.wagemakers@dordrecht.nl
Pim A J Luijsterburg
Edith M Heintjes
Marjolein Y Berger
Jan Verhaar
Bart W Koes
Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra
University of Groningen · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKnee injuries may lead to pain and to functional limitations in the activities of daily living. Patients with knee injuries are frequently seen in general practice; however, the outcome and management in these patients is not known.

aimTo assess the outcome and management of knee injuries at 12 months' follow-up in general practice. DESIGN OF STUDY: A prospective observational cohort study with a 1-year follow-up.

settingPrimary health care.

methodAdult patients consulting their GP after knee injury (n = 134) participated in the cohort. A magnetic resonance imaging scan was carried out and patients were diagnosed as either no lesion or an isolated meniscal tear, an isolated collateral or cruciate ligament lesion, or a combination. Follow-up questionnaires were filled in up to 12 months' follow-up.

resultsAt 12 months' follow-up, 34 patients reported full recovery and 67 patients reported major improvement. At baseline, 37 patients (28%) were referred to physical therapy and 17 patients (13%) were referred to secondary care. During 1 year of follow-up, another 21 referrals to physical therapy and 11 referrals to secondary care took place. The pain severity decreased the most, and the Lysholm knee score increased in the majority of patients during the first 3 months after injury. In total, 18 arthroscopies were performed in 15 patients. One patient underwent an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

conclusionThe vast majority of patients report clinically relevant recovery. There is no clear difference in outcomes between patients with meniscal tears or ligament lesions and patients without these diagnoses.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesArthralgiaArthroscopyEpidemiologic MethodsFamily PracticeFemaleHumansKnee InjuriesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRecovery of Function

Identifiers

PMID20132694
PMCPMC2814290
OpenAlexW2149570569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.