Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20131998›Full record

ReviewExpert review of anticancer therapy2010

Towards global consensus in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Peter Reichardt, Jean-Yves Blay, Margaret von Mehren

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of anticancer therapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01323400 (A Phase II Randomized Multicentre Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Pazopanib+Best Supportive Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01323400 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

A Phase II Randomized Multicentre Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Pazopanib+Best Supportive Care (BSC) Versus BSC Alone in Metastatic and/or Locally Advanced Unresectable GIST, Resistant to Imatinib and Sunitinib

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Leon BerardRan2011 to 2016Enrolled81ConditionsGISTArmsPazopanib, Best supportive care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopicWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2017
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A gist of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A review.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2013
    Article
  9. The war on cancer: are we winning?Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2013
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2012
    Article
  12. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors.International journal of colorectal disease · 2012
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Profile of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter ReichardtDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine, HELIOS Klinikum Bad Saarow, Pieskower Strasse 33, D-15526 Bad Saarow, Germany. peter.reichardt@helios-kliniken.de
Jean-Yves Blay
Margaret von Mehren
Fox Chase Cancer Center · USHelios Hospital Bad Saarow · DEUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

The Molecular Actions of Imatinib Mesylate in GISTsR01CA106588 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI GODWIN, ANDREW K., VON MEHREN, MARGARET · 2004 to 2013
$3.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA106588
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The contemporary clinical landscape of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) has evolved rapidly over the past several years. Widely used treatment guidelines--from the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network--have recently been updated and represent the most up-to-date, comprehensive tools guiding the optimal management of GIST. In these, and in other published guidelines, close alignment among recommendations now exists for many of the clinical issues relevant to GIST management--surgery, use of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib and sunitinib and the role of pre- and post-operative imatinib, among others. This trend towards a global consensus in the treatment of GIST is the result of a relatively large amount of new data across the spectrum of its management. However, for some clinical considerations, recommendations still partially deviate. This review examines clinical recommendations and opinions on the management of GIST in the context of the latest data in the field and with an eye towards a multidisciplinary approach including surgical oncology, medical oncology, pathology and diagnostic radiology. Points of consensus are highlighted. Expert opinion is presented on management areas where no scientific evidence or firm recommendations currently exist; lingering and unresolved questions or issues are included. Within this framework, we present an evaluation of current global guidelines on the following areas in GIST management: surgery in the metastatic setting; neoadjuvant therapy; adjuvant therapy; mutational analysis; maintenance tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy; and radiological imaging in GIST. A summary of consensus across these guidelines based on clinical trial data is juxtaposed with expert opinion where gaps in data still remain.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCombined Modality TherapyGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansNeoplasm MetastasisAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID20131998
PMCPMC4451074
OpenAlexW2035277030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.