Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20130902›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2010

Pregnancy outcomes in female hairdressers.

Elena Ronda, Bente E Moen, Ana M García, José Sánchez-Paya, Valborg Baste

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Reproductive disorders among cosmetologists and hairdressers: a meta-analysis.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Occupational Exposure of Hairdressers to Airborne Hazardous Chemicals: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Fertility disorders and pregnancy complications in hairdressers - a systematic review.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Elena RondaPublic Health Research Group, University of Alicante, Carretera San Vicente del Raspeig s/n, 03690, Alicante, Spain. Elena.Ronda@ua.es
Bente E Moen
Ana M García
José Sánchez-Paya
Valborg Baste
Hospital General Universitario de Alicante Doctor Balmis · ESInstituto Sindical de Trabajo Ambiente y Salud · ESUni Research (Norway) · NOUniversity of Alicante · ESUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe hairdressing occupation may entail exposure to a wide range of chemical products, psychosocial and physical stress. All these factors may affect the health of a pregnant hairdresser and her offspring. Our aim was to analyse whether employment in this profession is associated with adverse reproductive effects.

methodFemale hairdressers working in the 248 hairdressing salons in Alicante (Spain), who became pregnant for the first time after 1990 were included (n = 94). The incidence of spontaneous abortions, number of children born and their birth weight and preterm delivery among hairdressers was compared with a control group of shop assistants and office workers (n = 138). Information was collected through personal interviews at their work place. A structured questionnaire was used gathering information concerning exposure variables including the use of chemical products, ventilation at the salons, work-related stress and hours of standing work. In addition, socio-demographic factors and smoking information were obtained. Crude and adjusted relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated using logbinomial regression.

resultsHairdressers showed a non-significant increased risk of spontaneous abortions (RR = 1.6, 95%CI 0.9-2.7). There were no differences in preterm delivery and birth weight of the children born of mothers in the two groups. Among hairdressers, the RR of spontaneous abortion among those with high perceived work-related stress was 2.4 (95%CI: 0.2-28.3) relative to those with low or normal perceived stress.

conclusionsA slightly increased risk of spontaneous abortion among hairdressers was found, mainly associated with perceived work-related stress. Observed results deserve further research.

Indexed as

Beauty CultureAbortion, SpontaneousAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHairHumansInterviews as TopicMultivariate AnalysisOccupational ExposurePregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRisk FactorsSpainStress, PsychologicalYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20130902
OpenAlexW2015024035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.