Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20130066›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2010

A chimeric alphavirus replicon particle vaccine expressing the hemagglutinin and fusion proteins protects juvenile and infant rhesus macaques from measles.

Chien-Hsiung Pan, Catherine E Greer, Debra Hauer, Harold S Legg, Eun-Young Lee, M Jeff Bergen, Brandyn Lau, Robert J Adams, John M Polo, Diane E Griffin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Measles immunity and immunosuppression.Current opinion in virology · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Measles Vaccine.Viral immunology · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Toward RNA nanoparticle vaccines: synergizing RNA and inorganic nanoparticles to achieve immunopotentiation.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Ontogeny of early life immunity.Trends in immunology · 2014
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chien-Hsiung PanW. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Catherine E Greer
Debra Hauer
Harold S Legg
Eun-Young Lee
M Jeff Bergen
Brandyn Lau
Robert J Adams
John M Polo
Diane E Griffin
Johns Hopkins University · USNovartis (United States) · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

Immune Responses During Measles Virus InfectionR01AI023047 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GRIFFIN, DIANE E · 1986 to 2007
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI023047NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI23047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measles remains a major cause of child mortality, in part due to an inability to vaccinate young infants with the current live attenuated virus vaccine (LAV). To explore new approaches to infant vaccination, chimeric Venezuelan equine encephalitis/Sindbis virus (VEE/SIN) replicon particles were used to express the hemagglutinin (H) and fusion (F) proteins of measles virus (MV). Juvenile rhesus macaques vaccinated intradermally with a single dose of VEE/SIN expressing H or H and F proteins (VEE/SIN-H or VEE/SIN-H+F, respectively) developed high titers of MV-specific neutralizing antibody and gamma-interferon (IFN-gamma)-producing T cells. Infant macaques vaccinated with two doses of VEE/SIN-H+F also developed neutralizing antibody and IFN-gamma-producing T cells. Control animals were vaccinated with LAV or with a formalin-inactivated measles vaccine (FIMV). Neutralizing antibody remained above the protective level for more than 1 year after vaccination with VEE/SIN-H, VEE/SIN-H+F, or LAV. When challenged with wild-type MV 12 to 17 months after vaccination, all vaccinated juvenile and infant monkeys vaccinated with VEE/SIN-H, VEE/SIN-H+F, and LAV were protected from rash and viremia, while FIMV-vaccinated monkeys were not. Antibody was boosted by challenge in all groups. T-cell responses to challenge were biphasic, with peaks at 7 to 25 days and at 90 to 110 days in all groups, except for the LAV group. Recrudescent T-cell activity coincided with the presence of MV RNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. We conclude that VEE/SIN expressing H or H and F induces durable immune responses that protect from measles and offers a promising new approach for measles vaccination. The viral and immunological factors associated with long-term control of MV replication require further investigation.

Indexed as

Genetic VectorsAlphavirusAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralDisease Models, AnimalHemagglutinins, ViralHumansInjections, IntradermalInterferon-gammaMacaca mulattaMeaslesMeasles VaccineMeasles virusT-LymphocytesVaccines, SyntheticAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, Viralhemagglutinin protein G, measles virusHemagglutinins, ViralInterferon-gammaMeasles VaccineVaccines, SyntheticViral Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20130066
PMCPMC2849488
OpenAlexW2022866916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.