ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2010
Maximal conditional chi-square importance in random forests.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable deep neural network identifies robust biomarkers for diseases with mechanistic insights from omics data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Establishment of a Preoperative Laboratory Panel to identify Lymph Node Metastasis in Superficial Esophageal Cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2022Article
- A zero altered Poisson random forest model for genomic-enabled prediction.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- Application of data mining for predicting hemodynamics instability during pheochromocytoma surgery.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Article
- Genomic Prediction of Breeding Values Using a Subset of SNPs Identified by Three Machine Learning Methods.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Article
- Article
- Random forest classification of etiologies for an orphan disease.Statistics in medicine · 2015Article
- Data mining in the Life Sciences with Random Forest: a walk in the park or lost in the jungle?Briefings in bioinformatics · 2013Article
- Transcriptome classification reveals molecular subtypes in psoriasis.BMC genomics · 2012Article
- Random forests for genomic data analysis.Genomics · 2012Review
- Random forests for genetic association studies.Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology · 2011Review
- Comparative methods for association studies: a case study on metabolite variation in a Brassica rapa core collection.PloS one · 2011Article
- The use of classification trees for bioinformatics.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Data mining and knowledge discovery · 2011Article
- Power of data mining methods to detect genetic associations and interactions.Human heredity · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationHigh-dimensional data are frequently generated in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and other studies. It is important to identify features such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in GWAS that are associated with a disease. Random forests represent a very useful approach for this purpose, using a variable importance score. This importance score has several shortcomings. We propose an alternative importance measure to overcome those shortcomings.
resultsWe characterized the effect of multiple SNPs under various models using our proposed importance measure in random forests, which uses maximal conditional chi-square (MCC) as a measure of association between a SNP and the trait conditional on other SNPs. Based on this importance measure, we employed a permutation test to estimate empirical P-values of SNPs. Our method was compared to a univariate test and the permutation test using the Gini and permutation importance. In simulation, the proposed method performed consistently superior to the other methods in identifying of risk SNPs. In a GWAS of age-related macular degeneration, the proposed method confirmed two significant SNPs (at the genome-wide adjusted level of 0.05). Further analysis showed that these two SNPs conformed with a heterogeneity model. Compared with the existing importance measures, the MCC importance measure is more sensitive to complex effects of risk SNPs by utilizing conditional information on different SNPs. The permutation test with the MCC importance measure provides an efficient way to identify candidate SNPs in GWAS and facilitates the understanding of the etiology between genetic variants and complex diseases. CONTACT: heping.zhang@yale.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.