ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2010
Rapid and direct quantification of viable Candida species in whole blood by use of immunomagnetic separation and solid-phase cytometry.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Candida species are a common source of nosocomial bloodstream infections in critically ill patients. The sensitivity of the traditional diagnostic procedure based on blood culture is variable, and it usually takes 2 to 4 days before growth of Candida species is detected. We developed a 4-h method for the quantification of Candida species in blood, combining immunomagnetic separation (IMS) with solid-phase cytometry (SPC) using viability labeling. Additionally, Candida albicans cells could be identified in real time by using fluorescent in situ hybridization. By analysis of spiked blood samples, our method was shown to be sensitive and specific, with a low detection limit (1 cell/ml of blood). In a proof-of-concept study, we applied the IMS/SPC method to 16 clinical samples and compared it to traditional blood culture. Our method proved more sensitive than culture (seven samples were positive with IMS/SPC but negative with blood culture), and identification results were in agreement. The IMS/SPC data also suggest that mixed infections might occur frequently, as C. albicans and at least one other Candida species were found in five samples. Additionally, in two cases, high numbers of cells (175 to 480 cells/ml of blood) were associated with an endovascular source of infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.