Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20129873›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2010

Comparison of current-use pesticide and other toxicant urinary metabolite levels among pregnant women in the CHAMACOS cohort and NHANES.

Rosemary Castorina, Asa Bradman, Laura Fenster, Dana Boyd Barr, Roberto Bravo, Michelle G Vedar, Martha E Harnly, Thomas E McKone, Ellen A Eisen, Brenda Eskenazi

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Measurement of urinary pesticide biomarkers among Latina farmworkers in southwestern Idaho.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rosemary CastorinaCenter for Children's Environmental Health Research, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California 94704 , USA. rcastori@berkeley.edu
Asa Bradman
Laura Fenster
Dana Boyd Barr
Roberto Bravo
Michelle G Vedar
Martha E Harnly
Thomas E McKone
Ellen A Eisen
Brenda Eskenazi
Center for Environmental Health · USCalifornia Department of Public Health · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · US

Funding

Project C: Epigenetic Effects of DDT/E and PBDEs on PubertyP01ES009605 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI ESKENAZI, BRENDA · 1999 to 2015
$11.2M
Endocrine Disruptors and Neurodevelopmental OutcomesR01OH007400 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI ESKENAZI, BRENDA · 2001 to 2004
–
NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES009605NIEHS NIH HHS P01ES009605NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH007400NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH007400-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe measured 34 metabolites of current-use pesticides and other precursor compounds in urine samples collected twice during pregnancy from 538 women living in the Salinas Valley of California, a highly agricultural area (1999-2001). Precursors of these metabolites included fungicides, carbamate, organochlorine, organophosphorus (OP), and pyrethroid insecticides, and triazine and chloroacetanilide herbicides. We also measured ethylenethiourea, a metabolite of the ethylene-bisdithiocarbamate fungicides. Repeat measurements of the compounds presented here have not been reported in pregnant women previously. To understand the impact of the women's regional environment on these findings, we compared metabolite concentrations from the CHAMACOS (Center for the Health Assessment of Mothers and Children of Salinas) cohort with U.S. national reference data for 342 pregnant women sampled by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2002).

resultsThe eight metabolites detected in > 50% of samples [2,4-dichlorophenol (2,4-DCP); 2,5-dichlorophenol (2,5-DCP); 1- and 2-naphthol; ortho-phenylphenol (ORTH); para-nitrophenol (PNP); 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (2,4,6-TCP); and 3,4,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol (TCPy)] may be related to home or agricultural pesticide use in the Salinas Valley, household products, and other sources of chlorinated phenols. More than 78% of women in this study had detectable levels of at least one of the OP pesticide-specific metabolites that we measured, and > 30% had two or more. The 95th percentile values of six of the most commonly detected (> 50%) compounds were significantly higher among the CHAMACOS women after controlling for age, race, socioeconomic status, and smoking [(2,4-DCP; 2,5-DCP; ORTH; PNP; 2,4,6-TCP; and TCPy); quantile regression p < 0.05].

conclusionsFindings suggest that the CHAMACOS cohort has an additional burden of precursor pesticide exposure compared with the national sample, possibly from living and/or working in an agricultural area.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceCaliforniaChromatography, GasCohort StudiesCreatinineEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental MonitoringFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicNutrition SurveysPesticide ResiduesPregnancyCreatininePesticide Residues

Identifiers

PMID20129873
PMCPMC2898864
OpenAlexW2058640158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.