ArticleAtencion primaria2010
[Factors involved in the development of the community projects. Observational study of the Catalonian primary care centers AUPA network].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers to and Facilitators of Community Participation and Empowerment in Primary Health Care Centres in Italy: The Perspectives of Stakeholders and Practitioners.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Increasing community orientation of primary care health professionals: analysis of the training plan of a community health strategy.BMC primary care · 2026Observational
- Factors related to the development of health-promoting community activities in Spanish primary healthcare: two caseBMJ open · 2017Article
- [Community health in primary health care teams: a management objective].Atencion primaria · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe the characteristics of the AUPA Health Centres network, identify the favourable elements and the obstacles when carrying out community projects (CP), the impact of belonging to the AUPA network, and the types of support members expect from the AUPA Network.
designA cross-sectional, descriptive and analytical study with analysis of information using quantitative and qualitative techniques. LOCATION: Primary Care.
participants15 centres of Primary Care belonging to the AUPA network before January 2006. PRINCIPAL MEASUREMENTS: Variables regarding the characteristics of the Health Centres, professionals, CP, facilitators and obstacles of the CP, usefulness, expectations and impact of belonging to the AUPA network. PRINCIPAL
resultsThe majority of centres are teaching and receive methodological external support. The majority of CP are in initial phases of development and the most used methodology is Community Oriented Primary Care (COPC). The projects have the support of the community and intersectorial collaboration. Nursing is the group most involved. The factors that influence development of the CP are the motivation of the professionals, previous training in community care, management support and the participation of key personnel and the community. The community centres require more time to work on CP, methodological support from experts, better professional recognition, support by the Health Centre management and companies.
conclusionsIt is necessary to motivate professionals, promote knowledge in community care, giving recognition and support by the institutions and by the community. Work benefits are perceived from the network: sharing experiences, commitment and gaining knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.