Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20128919›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2010

Loratadine dysregulates cell cycle progression and enhances the effect of radiation in human tumor cell lines.

Benjamin P Soule, Nicole L Simone, William G DeGraff, Rajani Choudhuri, John A Cook, James B Mitchell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Histamine receptors and cancer pharmacology: an update.British journal of pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cyproheptadine use in hepatocellular carcinoma.American journal of cancer research · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin P SouleRadiation Biology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. souleb@mail.nih.gov
Nicole L Simone
William G DeGraff
Rajani Choudhuri
John A Cook
James B Mitchell
National Cancer Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Modulation of Therapeutic ResponseZIASC006321 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI MITCHELL, JAMES · 2009 to 2025
$17.3M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe histamine receptor-1 (H1)-antagonist, loratadine has been shown to inhibit growth of human colon cancer xenografts in part due to cell cycle arrest in G2/M. Since this is a radiation sensitive phase of the cell cycle, we sought to determine if loratadine modifies radiosensitivity in several human tumor cell lines with emphasis on human colon carcinoma (HT29).

methodsCells were treated with several doses of loratadine at several time points before and after exposure to radiation. Radiation dose modifying factors (DMF) were determined using full radiation dose response survival curves. Cell cycle phase was determined by flow cytometry and the expression of the cell cycle-associated proteins Chk1, pChk1(ser345), and Cyclin B was analyzed by western blot.

resultsLoratadine pre-treatment of exponentially growing cells (75 microM, 24 hours) increased radiation-induced cytotoxicity yielding a radiation DMF of 1.95. However, treatment of plateau phase cells also yielded a DMF of 1.3 suggesting that mechanisms other than cell cycle arrest also contribute to loratadine-mediated radiation modification. Like irradiation, loratadine initially induced G2/M arrest and activation of the cell-cycle associated protein Chk1 to pChk1(ser345), however a subsequent decrease in expression of total Chk1 and Cyclin B correlated with abrogation of the G2/M checkpoint. Analysis of DNA repair enzyme expression and DNA fragmentation revealed a distinct pattern of DNA damage in loratadine-treated cells in addition to enhanced radiation-induced damage. Taken together, these data suggest that the observed effects of loratadine are multifactorial in that loratadine 1) directly damages DNA, 2) activates Chk1 thereby promoting G2/M arrest making cells more susceptible to radiation-induced DNA damage and, 3) downregulates total Chk1 and Cyclin B abrogating the radiation-induced G2/M checkpoint and allowing cells to re-enter the cell cycle despite the persistence of damaged DNA.

conclusionsGiven this unique possible mechanism of action, loratadine has potential as a chemotherapeutic agent and as a modifier of radiation responsiveness in the treatment of cancer and, as such, may warrant further clinical evaluation.

Indexed as

Blotting, WesternCell CycleCell Cycle ProteinsDNA Repair EnzymesHT29 CellsHumansLoratadineRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsRadiation ToleranceCell Cycle ProteinsDNA Repair EnzymesLoratadineRadiation-Sensitizing Agents

Identifiers

PMID20128919
PMCPMC2829588
OpenAlexW2161855240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.