SynthesisMolecular biology reports2011
Complement factor H Y402H gene polymorphism and coronary heart disease susceptibility: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Molecular biology reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association between KCNJ11 gene polymorphisms and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in East Asian populations: a meta-analysis in 42,573 individuals.Molecular biology reports · 2012Pooled it
- Understanding the Role of Anti-PEG Antibodies in the Complement Activation by Doxil in Vitro.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The complement factor H (CFH) Y402H (T1277C) gene polymorphism has been reported to be associated with coronary heart disease (CHD), but results were conflicting. To evaluate the role of the variant in CHD, we performed meta-analyses of all available data. Both electronic and manual searches were performed, all relevant studies were identified. ORs with 95% confidential intervals (CI) under codominant (CC versus TT, TC versus TT), dominant (CC + TC versus TT) and recessive (CC versus TT + TC) models were calculated. Publication bias was addressed. Ten studies including 11 cohorts comprising of 29,764 participants were included. No association between the CFH T1227C polymorphism and CHD could be found. (For overall analysis: dominant model, OR = 1.04, 95%CI: 0.97-1.11; recessive model, OR = 1.04, 95%CI: 0.97-1.11; for Caucasian subgroup: OR = 1.08 95%CI: 0.92-1.27; recessive model, OR = 1.03, 95%CI: 0.96-1.11). Two studies reported positive results in separate population (Caucasian study: recessive model, OR = 0.51, 95%CI: 0.30-0.86; Asians study: dominant model, OR = 2.37, 95%CI: 1.13-4.96). Current evidence do not support the association between the CFH T1277C polymorphism and CHD risk among common population. The association, which could be influenced by CHD onset age, CHD risk factors status and genetics backgrounds, might be significant in some population. More studies on different CHD onset ages and risk factor status should be encouraged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20127520What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.